White House wants to reduce indirect payments from 28% to 10%.

Oxford’s decision on compulsory retirement raises pressing questions about fairness – and what is best for academia as a whole.

President Donald Trump's administration has brought a long-simmering debate over how the U.S. government supports university research back to a boil.

The open access contracts between the Dutch universities and publishers Elsevier and Springer have to be publicly disclosed. That is the verdict of the committee charged with considering the appeal of the publishers against a freedom of information request.

A new book by actor Alan Alda is all about communication — and miscommunication — between doctors, scientists and civilians.

Striking a Balance: Embracing Change While Preserving Tradition in Scholarly Communications

Publons wants scientists to be rewarded for assessing others’ work.

This feature enables users to update the record’s files after they have been made public and researchers to easily cite either specific versions of a record or to cite, via a top-level DOI, all the versions of a record.

Nature will publish more details on experiments described in life-sciences papers.

Thousands of open access papers have mistakenly asked readers to pay access fees, but publishers are correcting the errors.

Race-blind reviews very difficult and may not help, researchers say

Private firm says its watchlist of untrustworthy journals will be objective and transparent — but not free.

We’re moving the online journal forward, and we hope you’ll join us on our journey.

Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.

Horizon 2020 found to be meeting its objectives, but is underfunded

A few years back, scientists at the biotechnology company Amgen set out to replicate 53 landmark studies that argued for new approaches to treat cancers using both existing and new molecules. They were able to replicate the findings of the original research only 11 percent of the time.