Credit for Peer Review: What is It Worth?

18.10.2018

In Review

18.10.2018

In Review: a New Way to Open Up the Submissions and Peer Review Process

18.10.2018

How to Write a Thorough Peer Review

17.10.2018

A Process Guide

10.10.2018

Science's Quality-Control Process Gets a Makeover

10.10.2018

Fake News Comes to Academia

03.10.2018

Mass Resignation Guts Board of Prestigious Cochrane Collaboration

18.09.2018

Eight Ways to Tackle Diversity and Inclusion in Peer Review

17.09.2018

Gender and International Diversity Improves Equity in Peer Review

14.09.2018

Global State of Peer Review

10.09.2018

Peer Reviewers Unmasked: Largest Global Survey Reveals Trends

06.09.2018

Publish Peer Reviews

03.09.2018

Publish Peer Reviews

29.08.2018

Open Letter on the Publication of Peer Review Reports

29.08.2018

Transparency, Credit, and Peer Review

29.08.2018

Peer Review of Health Research Funding Proposals: A Systematic Map and Systematic Review of Innovations for Effectiveness and Efficiency

15.08.2018

Reputation or Peer Review? the Role of Outliers

15.08.2018

Citizen Science Can Make Systematic Reviews Faster and More Efficient

10.08.2018

Publons' ECR Reviewers' Choice Awards

09.08.2018

Meritocratic Publishing: Open Access and Tackling Discrimination in Academia

08.08.2018

Peer Review Has Some Problems - but the Science Community Is Working on It

15.07.2018

Scholarly Publishing Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It

04.07.2018

10 Considerations for Open Peer Review

04.07.2018

Peer Review is Not Scientific

02.07.2018

A New Twist on Peer Review

30.06.2018

Peer Review: eLife Trials a New Approach

27.06.2018

Some Science Journals That Claim to Peer Review Papers Do Not Do So

21.06.2018

Editors of Major Political Science Journals Demonstrate No Systematic Bias Against Female Authors

14.06.2018

Introducing Metadata for Peer Review

06.06.2018
Subscribe to News