Criteria for Assessing Grant Applications: A Systematic Review

14.08.2019

Filling in the Gaps: The Interpretation of Curricula Vitae in Peer Review

14.08.2019

Amidst Criticism of the Peer Review Process, the Valuable Contributions of Reviewers Should Be Defended

08.08.2019

Why We Shouldn’t Take Peer Review as the ‘Gold Standard’

05.08.2019

Balancing Author Satisfaction with Reviewer Needs

25.07.2019

Why It's So Hard To Reform Peer Review

22.07.2019

You've Completed Your Review - Now Get Credit with ORCID

30.06.2019

Peer Review Week Is Five!

27.06.2019

Launching Transpose, a Database of Journal Policies on Preprinting & Peer Review

14.06.2019

Peer Review is Not Just Quality Control, It is Part of the Social Infrastructure of Research

13.06.2019

Taiwan Considers Double-blind Peer Review for Grants

09.06.2019

Artificial Intelligence is Selecting Grant Reviewers in China

19.05.2019

Registered Reports: Peer Review Before Results Are Known to Align Scientific Values and Practices

Early-Career Researchers Commonly Ghostwrite Peer Reviews. That's a Problem

15.05.2019

Self-organising Peer Review for Preprints - A Future Paradigm for Scholarly Publishing

03.05.2019

Junior researchers often ghostwrite peer reviews

01.05.2019

'Friendly' Reviewers Rate Grant Applications More Highly

18.04.2019

Three-year Trial Shows Support for Recognizing Peer Reviewers

18.04.2019

The Peer Review Game: an Agent-based Model of Scientists Facing Resource Constraints and Institutional Pressures

17.04.2019

Assessing Peer Review by Gauging the Fate of Rejected Manuscripts: the Case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

17.04.2019

Opening the Black-Box of Peer Review

17.04.2019

Does Incentive Provision Increase the Quality of Peer Review? An Experimental Study

17.04.2019

Saint Matthew Strikes Again: An Agent-based Model of Peer Review and the Scientific Community Structure

17.04.2019

https://psyarxiv.com/483zj

17.04.2019

The "invisible Hand" of Peer Review: The Implications of Author-referee Networks on Peer Review in a Scholarly Journal

15.04.2019

The F3-index. Valuing Reviewers for Scholarly Journals

15.04.2019

Peering Into Peer Review

15.04.2019

Attitudes of Referees in a Multidisciplinary Journal: An Empirical Analysis

13.04.2019

Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-Making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants

13.04.2019

Libero Reviewer: The Making of a User-friendly Submission and Peer-review Platform

12.04.2019
Subscribe to News