ScienceGeist

Demonstrating research integrity is increasingly a demand for institutions receiving funding. However, whilst hundreds of articles have been written on the topic, precisely what this consists of is less clear.

Hong Kong Principles seek to replace 'publish or perish' culture.

A legal journal has retracted a 2019 article on the facial genetics of ethnic minorities in China for ethics violations. Springer Nature is investigating more than two dozen other articles for similar concerns.

Via Wikimedia A journal has allowed a geophysicist who cited his own work hundreds of times across 10 papers to retract the articles and republish them with a fraction of the self-citations. 

Dr. Sapan Desai, who supplied the data for two prominent and later retracted studies, is said to have a history of cutting corners and misrepresenting information in pursuit of his ambitions.

Nature has retracted a recent commentary after the author complained that he had been misled by the relationship of the publication to a financial sponsor and told to avoid critiquing work from the institution. The journal says it is revisiting its “editorial guidelines and processes” in the wake of the case. 

Was there ever a golden age of unsullied science, as a book implies?

Personal integrity and local culture are key to research integrity, and bullying and harassment is the single biggest negative influence, according to a new study by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

Mysterious company Surgisphere declined to provide access to hospital data used to evaluate drugs in COVID-19 patients.

The now retracted paper halted hydroxychloroquine trials. Studies like this determine how people live or die tomorrow.

More than 120 researchers and medical professionals from around the world have written an open letter to the editor of the Lancet raising serious concerns about a large and widely publicised global study that prompted the World Health Organisation to halt several Covid-19 clinical trials.

The Cummings saga has made it plain that scientific advisers are shielding the government's collapsing reputation on coronavirus, says Lancet editor Richard Horton.

Elisabeth Bik quit her job to spot errors in research papers - and has become the public face of image sleuthing.

Some scholars and academics wrongly ascribe scientists' legitimate disagreements about Covid-19 to ignorance or questionable political or other motivations.

For his Covid-19 work, the respected Stanford physician and scientist John Ioannidis is being accused of the same bad science he has criticized.

Admitting scientific errors is hard. It's also important.

When science is viewed in isolation from the past and politics, it's easier for those with bad intentions to revive dangerous and discredited ideas.

Online sleuths have discovered what they suspect is a paper mill that has produced more than 400 scientific papers with potentially fabricated images. Some journals are now investigating the papers.

The virus doesn’t follow the news and doesn’t care about Twitter. This article proposes that reporting should distinguish between at least three levels of information reliability.

Investigation finds that biophysicist Kuo-Chen Chou repeatedly suggested dozens of citations be added to papers.

The authors of LERU's new paper on research integrity - Inge Lerouge and Ton Hol - discuss trust in science and how to earn it.

McGill professor resigns over university's repeated votes to keep investing in fossil fuels.

A tool that focuses on papers - not researcher behaviour - can help readers, editors and institutions assess which publications to trust.

Quarterly updates on scientific integrity in the US nearly three years into the Trump administration.

A swift increase in scientific productivity has outstripped the country's ability to promote rigour and curb academic misconduct; it is time to seize solutions.

The Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Research Integrity, which forms the basis of this report, was carried out between July 2018 and June 2019 by a dedicated Policy Support Facility (PSF) panel consisting of four independent experts and twelve countries.

To combat academic dishonesty, focus on educational systems and not just individual offenders, says Tracey Bretag.

Imperial's new conference policy puts guidance on promoting equality, diversity and inclusion at the forefront.

Universities worry about protecting privacy as they confront the growing problem of harrassment.

Image manipulation is nothing new, but its application for scientific and medical fraud is leaving lives and livelihoods at stake.