The Non-Scientist’s Guide to Reading and Understanding a Scientific Paper
The right approach and a little extra effort will help improve your scientific literacy.
Send us a link
The right approach and a little extra effort will help improve your scientific literacy.
Papers with female first authors receive 10% fewer citations than comparable work published by men, according to a new study
Artificial intelligence is outperforming the human sort in a growing range of fields – but how do we make sure it behaves morally?
Libraries can survive these times of technological upheaval, but they’re going to have to change–and fast.
Containerization technology takes the hassle out of setting up software and can boost the reproducibility of data-driven research.
May 28-31, 2017, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
They act as a “social vaccine” that protects female students against negative stereotypes and gives them a sense of belonging.
Good looking, sociable people don’t make good scientists, according to popular stereotypes.
Supporting the development of new models for open research data in the digital age.
Research institutions should have regular open conversations on authorship criteria and ethics and that funding agencies adopt ORCID and accept CRediT.
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe
Report urges academy to ‘embrace’ opportunities for wider research dissemination
Exploring the diverse pathways traveled by science, engineering, and health doctorates as they progress through their careers.
Cornerstone of modern science immortalized in concrete.
The Research Council of Norway is giving universities and university colleges a six-month deadline to upload articles stemming from Council-funded projects to open repositories.
A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research.
Efforts to promote and enforce shared research have made progress in China, but there is much room for improvement.
The President's proposed budget guts scientific research and protection, because it either doesn't know what science is for, or doesn't care.
We find Nature Research's critical attitude towards journal impact factors, embodied in its signing of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA; Nature 544, 394; 2017), to be inconsistent with the aims of its Nature Index.
The scholarly process is ridden with single points of failures at all stages.
How several free software tools have fundamentally upgraded our approach to collaborative research, making our entire workflow more transparent and streamlined.
What happens when an experiment is correct, but it's really hard to replicate? Are there research results that are accurate but not reproducible?
Lengthy publication delays, theft of rivals’ research, allegations of shoddy reviewing, and even the faking of reviews are raising new questions about a decades-old scientific tradition