Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Pandemic Claims New Victims: Prestigious Medical Journals

The Pandemic Claims New Victims: Prestigious Medical Journals

Two major study retractions in one month have left researchers wondering if the peer review process is broken.

Coronavirus in Context: Scite.ai Tracks Positive and Negative Citations for COVID-19 Literature

Coronavirus in Context: Scite.ai Tracks Positive and Negative Citations for COVID-19 Literature

Artificial-intelligence tool aims to reveal whether research findings are supported or contradicted by subsequent studies.

The Limitations to Our Understanding of Peer Review

The Limitations to Our Understanding of Peer Review

Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems. Despite its critical importance, it curiously remains poorly understood in a number of dimensions. In order to address this, this paper assesses where the major gaps in the theoretical and empirical understanding of peer review lie. 

Scholarly Publishers Are Working Together to Maximize Efficiency During COVID-19 Pandemic

Scholarly Publishers Are Working Together to Maximize Efficiency During COVID-19 Pandemic

Scholarly publishers are working together to maximize the efficiency of peer review, ensuring that key work related to COVID-19 is reviewed and published as quickly and openly as possible. The group of publishers and scholarly communications organizations - initially comprising eLife, Hindawi, PeerJ, PLOS, Royal Society, F1000 Research, FAIRsharing, Outbreak Science, and PREreview - is... Read full article >

Women Academics Seem to Be Submitting Fewer Papers During Coronavirus

Women Academics Seem to Be Submitting Fewer Papers During Coronavirus

Editors of academic journals have started noticing a trend: Women - who inevitably shoulder a greater share of family responsibilities - seem to be submitting fewer papers, while men are submitting up to 50 percent more than they usually would.

Springer Nautre Commits to 'Transformative Journal' Criteria from COAlition S

Springer Nautre Commits to 'Transformative Journal' Criteria from COAlition S

Revised ‘Transformative Journal’ criteria from cOAlition S are “challenging” but Springer Nature commits to transition majority of journals, including Nature. Approach means Plan S-funded authors will be able to continue to submit research to these journals.

COVID-19 and the Future of Open Access

COVID-19 and the Future of Open Access

A systematic focus on governance – instead of, or at least alongside, open access – is vital for the future of publishing. Even if the for-profit publishing model is not going to be ‘killed’ any time soon, governance may still allow us to assert some control over it. Coupled with the publishing futures already being created and nurtured by library publishers, university presses and scholar-led collectives, we may be able to imagine a world that isn’t trapped in the logic of COVID-19.

How China's New Policy May Change Researchers' Publishing Behavior

How China's New Policy May Change Researchers' Publishing Behavior

A researcher from the Wuhan University of China offers a view of how Chinese researchers are reacting and are likely to alter their behavior in response to new policies governing research evaluation.

How Academic Science Gave Its Soul to the Publishing Industry

How Academic Science Gave Its Soul to the Publishing Industry

Self-governance of science was supposed to mean freedom of inquiry, but it also ended up serving the business model of scientific publishers while undermining the goals of science policy.

Historical Comparison of Gender Inequality in Scientific Careers Across Countries and Disciplines

Historical Comparison of Gender Inequality in Scientific Careers Across Countries and Disciplines

A study suggests that the productivity and impact of gender differences are explained by different publishing career lengths and dropout rates. This inequality in academic publishing has important consequences for institutions and policy makers.