ScienceDisrupt Picks From 2016
We wanted to share with you some of the awesome science innovations and disruptors from the last year. This is our list.
We wanted to share with you some of the awesome science innovations and disruptors from the last year. This is our list.
In Germany, negotiations between scientific publishing company Elsevier and a consortium of hundreds of universities, technical schools, research institutes, and public libraries stalled in December 2016. As a result, more than 60 institutions have lost their online access to Elsevier's journals effective 1 January, although some can still access archived articles published before that date. The price of the journals is only part of the problem.
Answers of the annual Edge.org question posed to leading thinkers and scientists.
Principles promote access to Federal government-supported scientific data and research findings for international scientific cooperation
Groups of authors citing each other is becoming an issue in scientific publishing. With a new approach, researchers discuss how to identify the problem.
Envisioning the scientific paper of the future.
Scientists in Taiwan, Germany, and Peru will lose access to more than 12,000 scientific journals after institutions boycott the publishing giant for high prices and minimal open-access options.
Using Census Data to Inform Policy and Career Decision-Making
Dame Athene Donald laments the lack of progress on gender issues
The current peer-review system is limited to asking two people for their opinions - this is not enough.
As talks with the publisher stall, researchers in the country weigh whether they can cope without a deal
Peer-review had a role to play when journals were all in print and competing for subscription real estate, but today it may be little more than a vestige of the print era.
The Canadian government is again in the midst of its annual consultations on innovation. It seems our efforts to find the magic key to an “innovative economy” just never go away. By Aled Edwards, CEO of the Structural Genomics Consortium and professor at the University of Toronto.
A set of best practices for scientific software development, based on research and experience, that will improve scientists' productivity and the reliability of their software.
With corporate funding of research, “there’s no scientist who comes out of this unscathed.”
2016 will go down as a year that taught us to question our assumptions. The election of Donald Trump, an outcome
Time devoted to research is increasingly precious to us in academia. We chastise ourselves for not being able to keep up with the huge volumes of current literature. If only there was some way that all the latest literature on a particular topic could be packaged together for us, and delivered right to our inbox without us even having to lift a finger! Now, what would we call such an improbable utopia – ah yes, peer review.
The potential for open scholarship to improve university research and education, as well asincrease the impact universities can have beyond their own walls.
A committment by a young researcher to practice open and good science, and more generally to free culture.
Fake news has been in the news a lot lately. Fake news proliferated wildly during the 2016 U.S. election, much of it completely fabricated, usually with an extreme partisan bias. Fake news is corrosive. It mis-informs the public, divides people against one another, leads to bad policy decisions, and can even induce people to take action against imaginary threats.
Traditionally, at the beginning of the new year we celebrated what is known as Public Domain Day: on the first of January of any given year the works of authors who have been dead for more than 70 years enter the public domain. As this is a decisive year for copyright reform in the European Union, it seems much more important to highlight the dangers for the public domain that we are facing in the context of the copyright reform process.