Why Researchers Should Get the Same Client Confidentiality As Doctors
Promises made by researchers to participants to elicit the truth may not be worth the paper their written on if the courts can bulldoze though them.
Promises made by researchers to participants to elicit the truth may not be worth the paper their written on if the courts can bulldoze though them.
All the videos and slides from #scidata16.
A platform for displaying text-mined annotations as a means to link research articles with biological data
The real innovation of CiteScore is not another performance metric, but a new marketing model focused on editors.
The open-access microbiology journal mSphere will give authors a "super-fast track" option toward publication. The idea has some ardent fans, but is also drawing doubts.
A worldwide coding competition reveals the universities producing the very best coders.
How to address high tech’s missing XX factor
A little over 1 year ago, the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) launched mSphere as an open-access, online, pan-microbial sciences journal. We established two major goals: publish cutting-edge science and implement policies and processes to make the publication experience less onerous for authors.
Research performance of all Italian professors in the sciences over three consecutive four-year periods.
The measurement of Impact Factor – how many citations a publication or a researcher is able to attract, is one of the most controversial yet most widely used quality indicators in science.
What academic research caught the public imagination in 2016?
One Trump adviser suggested that NASA no longer should conduct climate research and instead should focus on space exploration.
A list of some of the shady things Elsevier has been previously caught doing
If funding applications were made under open access, science would benefit from more universal scrutiny.
French, German, and UK's joint guidelines for high-quality publications in scientific journals.
Withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review
The trend of turning universities into businesses is limiting research freedoms in traditionally liberal institutes in northern Europe.
Sociologist Matthijs Rooduijn explains why the darkening political mood must force academics to step up and choose sides.
The University of California, Berkeley, and the Broad Institute are vying for lucrative rights to the gene-editing system.
Yesterday, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act into law.
Women in academia may be losing out salary-wise because they are more focused on tasks that may go unrewarded, a new study suggests
Elsevier explains the thought process behind its new journal impact metrics.
How the research librarian of the future might work, utilising new data science and digital skills to drive more collaborative and open scholarship.
A perspective by Kathy L. Hudson and Francis S. Collins on the 21st Century Cures Act.
A guide to help selfish academics ensure that everyone at a conference knows they are very special indeed.
With the rise of Wikipedia as a first‐stop source for scientific information, it is important to understand whether Wikipedia draws upon the research that scientists value most. Here we identify the 250...