Why I Still Won’t Review For or Publish With Elsevier–And Think You Shouldn’t Either
A list of some of the shady things Elsevier has been previously caught doing
A list of some of the shady things Elsevier has been previously caught doing
If funding applications were made under open access, science would benefit from more universal scrutiny.
French, German, and UK's joint guidelines for high-quality publications in scientific journals.
Withholding results to address publication bias in peer-review
The trend of turning universities into businesses is limiting research freedoms in traditionally liberal institutes in northern Europe.
Sociologist Matthijs Rooduijn explains why the darkening political mood must force academics to step up and choose sides.
The University of California, Berkeley, and the Broad Institute are vying for lucrative rights to the gene-editing system.
Yesterday, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act into law.
Women in academia may be losing out salary-wise because they are more focused on tasks that may go unrewarded, a new study suggests
Elsevier explains the thought process behind its new journal impact metrics.
How the research librarian of the future might work, utilising new data science and digital skills to drive more collaborative and open scholarship.
A perspective by Kathy L. Hudson and Francis S. Collins on the 21st Century Cures Act.
A guide to help selfish academics ensure that everyone at a conference knows they are very special indeed.
With the rise of Wikipedia as a first‐stop source for scientific information, it is important to understand whether Wikipedia draws upon the research that scientists value most. Here we identify the 250...
An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data investigates how many papers are mentioned in policy-related documents. We find that less than 0.5% of the papers published in different subject categories are mentioned at least once in policy-related documents. Based on our results, we recommend that the analysis of (WoS) publications with at least one policy-related mention is repeated regularly (annually). Mentions in policy-related documents should not be used for impact measurement until new policy-related sites are tracked.
Sick of relying on commercial platforms for academic sharing? Humanities Commons, SocArXiv, and the Center for Open Science to the rescue!
A partnership of funding organizations committed to the open sharing of research outputs.
Eight highly-visible organizations today announced the launch of the Open Research Funders Group, a partnership designed to increase access to research outputs. With nearly $5 billion in combined annual grants conferred, these organizations are committed to using their positions to foster more open sharing of research articles and data. This openness, the members believe, will accelerate the pace of discovery, reduce information-sharing gaps, encourage innovation, and promote reproducibility.
More than 60 major German research institutions are to be expected to have no access to the full texts of journals by the publisher Elsevier from 1 January 2017 on, among them Göttingen University with 440 Elsevier journals.
Using analytics to improve hiring decisions has transformed industries from baseball to investment banking. So why are tenure decisions for professors still made the old-fashioned way?, asks Erik Brynjolfsson from MIT.
Amazon made its first commercial drone delivery on Dec. 7 in Cambridgeshire, England.
Over 60 major German research institutions are canceling their subscriptions to all of Elsevier's academic and scientific journals, effective January 1, 2017.
Figshare announced a new partnership with Springer Nature to support BioMed Central and SpringerOpen authors who wish to openly share their supplementary data. Figshare are now hosting additional files from more than 300 BioMed Central and SpringerOpen journals.
Why does a mole rat live 30 years but a mouse only three? With $1.5 billion in the bank, Google’s anti-aging spinout Calico is rich enough to find out.
Prospective cohort study of unsolicited and unwanted academic invitations.