Disgraced Stem-Cell Entrepreneur Under Fresh Investigation
Davide Vannoni is barred from offering a controversial stem-cell therapy in Italy but may be continuing his work abroad.
Davide Vannoni is barred from offering a controversial stem-cell therapy in Italy but may be continuing his work abroad.
While the total output of the eleven open-access mega-journals grew by 14.9% between 2014 and 2015, this growth is largely attributable to the increased output of Scientific Reports and Medicine.
In the aftermath of the election results, a group of women in the sciences has banded together to speak out against anti-intellectualism, inequality, sexism and discrimination.
In a fractured world, the humanities are key to an understanding of others.
Pressure to barrel through a PhD can make taking a break seem daunting — but there are ways to limit career damage.
Will F1000Research and Wellcome Open Research be replacing journals and editors?
Physicists and scientific computing experts prepare for an onslaught of petabytes.
A collection of Twitter hashtags about science communication to facilitate engagement with academics and professionals on Twitter.
The winners in Trump's America were likely to be the defence industry, oil and energy, private prisons, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Not health. What should be the response of the public health community?
PIDapalooza, the first ever festival of persistent identifiers, set out not only to bring together the creators and users of PIDs, but also to make PIDs cool.
This study investigates whether bias with single-blind review is greatest in a setting of author or institutional prestige.
Following a £2 billion research pledge, questions remain around commitment to boost science investment.
Microsoft is putting its considerable financial and engineering muscle into the experimental field of quantum computing as it works to build a machine that could tackle problems beyond the reach of today’s digital computers.
An artificial intelligence system developed by researchers at DeepMind and the University of Oxford got so good by watching 5000 hours of BBC programmes.
The Association of American Universities worries that the open-access policies federal research agencies are developing now are not sufficiently aligned. Any slowdown in putting them in place, it says, is "probably a positive."
20% of the scientists undertook between 69% and 94% of reviews last year.
Without access to large companies' datasets or the expertise to analyse them, research is confronted with a replication crisis and is vulnerable to commercial motivations.
How a corrosive culture keeps women out of leadership positions on math journals
A good idea is important of course, but much of the success of a start-up enterprise relies on it setting up in the right place.
A judge has ordered Marie-Ève Maille to provide names and transcripts from her study on a wind farm
Twenty percent of medical researchers do up to 95 percent of the peer reviewing.
But grave challenges remain before the promise of individually tailored medicine becomes reality.
And so, my fellow scientists: ask not what you can do for reproducibility; ask what reproducibility can do for you! Here, I present five reasons why working reproducibly pays off in the long run and is in the self-interest of every ambitious, career-oriented scientist.