When Science Needs Self-Correcting
Admitting scientific errors is hard. It's also important.
Admitting scientific errors is hard. It's also important.
The publisher will launch five new journals, and has introduced a new business model that aims to spread the cost of publishing more fairly.
Science is riddled with stories of getting scooped, data glitches and funding crises. Five researchers share stories of how they rallied.
More government cash is the only way to cut student costs, argue Rudy Fichtenbaum and Hank Reichman
Researchers can still operate by the rules and norms of science, but under Horizon 2020 they have - with the exception of the ERC - no autonomy to decide what science they do.
Reading a scientific paper is not the same as understanding Shakespeare.
Current efforts to make research more accessible and transparent can reinforce inequality within STEM professions.
European governments are taking steps to break their dependence on critical scientific data the United States historically made freely available to the world, and are ramping up their own data collection systems to monitor climate change and weather extremes
Any scientist publishing a claim should quantify their confidence in it with a probability, argues Steven N. Goodman.
Paper describe how LU builds up its support for FAIR data before, during and after research through its involvement in leading practices, training and consultancy and end with recommendations for other universities wanting to implement the FAIR principles.
The early 1970s brought fundamental transitions in international scientific collaboration, many of which are still relevant today.
Mothers in academic research and those who support them say in a report that the funding system can and should remedy gender bias in the sciences.
As conflicts escalate, resource shortages and patient safety force researchers in Middle Eastern countries to make difficult decisions about clinical trials.
"I'm not a scientist." How many times have you heard that lately from politicians who are trying to duck questions about important scientific topics like climate change and vaccines?
The South Korean government is expanding an investigation into researchers who named their children as co-authors on papers.
As scientists, we try to make sure our research is rigorous so that we can avoid costly errors. We should take the same approach to tackle issues in research culture, says Professor Christopher Jackson.
Researchers have been receiving notices from Academia.edu with takedown requests from Elsevier.
Openly discussing the history of science, where is has gone wrong, and the incredible efforts individual scientists go to uncover fraud should inspire confidence in its self-correcting nature.
Canada’s experience with virtual panels shows that the status quo should be challenged, not accepted unthinkingly.
“How’s my paper doing?” It’s such a simple question, and in today’s hyperconnected world it’s relatively easy to work out who’s reading and talking about your scientific publications. But are there conversations you might be overlooking?
Survey of undergraduate women finds that most experienced some type of unwanted sexual attention during their physics studies. "A lot of times, people study how women can change to better fit in a field or be more successful. Perhaps physics needs to think about changing itself.”
It seems obvious that lowering the cost of communication among innovators would facilitate scientific and technological progress. Yet, few studies examine this relationship.
Investigators with substantial, long-term, unrestricted research support may generally hold no more than one NIGMS research grant.
A solution to fix the replication crisis in science: why do scientists not simply sell what they learn from their research?
A new study shows that little teams are more likely to take their research in radically new directions.
If researchers want to have maximum impact, women must be at the table.