Ending Coronavirus Lockdowns Will Be a Dangerous Process of Trial and Error
There's no scientific consensus on when it's safe to reopen schools, businesses, restaurants, and bars
There's no scientific consensus on when it's safe to reopen schools, businesses, restaurants, and bars
Debating scientific topics in a courtroom setting could be a way to inform and engage citizens in public policy.
"It almost seems like a magical thing," said one of the astronomers involved in studying the lunar phenomenon.
A mathematical model designed to forecast the success of biotechnology papers has drawn criticism from researchers.
During this unprecedented global emergency, LIBER calls on European Commissioners, Member State governments, publishers and authors to urgently help libraries, universities and other educational establishments, so that they can continue supplying researchers, teachers and students with access to books, archives and other instructional materials.
Scientists perform a tiny subset of all possible experiments. What characterizes the experiments they choose? And what are the consequences of those choices for the pace of scientific discovery?
Consultants think they can make publicly funded research more efficient. But they’re in danger of ignoring existing analyses – and real-life experience.
The disparity between the rich and everyone else is larger than ever in the United States and increasing in much of Europe. Why?
The Nature Index tracks the affiliations of high-quality scientific articles. The infographic indicates patterns of international collaboration captured by the Nature Index.
The involvement of online discussion sites in the identification of errors, anomalies and worse in the published literature continues to demonstrate the usefulness of post-publication review. It also highlights the ambiguous power of anonymity.
Beth Simone Noveck urges researchers to work out how technology can improve public institutions.
Modern science is becoming larger-scale and more collaborative.
Analysis reveals that female researchers are over-represented on the social-media site and that mathematicians and life scientists are less likely to use it.
In recent years science has entered a crisis of trust. The results of many scientific experiments appear to be surprisingly hard to reproduce, while mistakes have highlighted flaws in the peer review system.
Institutions and funders should be alert to unfeasibly prolific authors when measuring and creating incentives for researcher productivity.
Journal editors tend to accept manuscripts written by prior collaborators more quickly.
The internet has radically changed most forms of communication, government and business – why not science and research funding too?
“If civilisation was destroyed, what scientific information would you pass on to the survivors?”
The region's scientists lament that their research is too often disconnected from the larger scientific world. In the age of Zika, that needs to change.
Failure to replicate is not a bug; it is a feature. It is what leads us along the path of scientific discovery.
All research findings at the Montreal Neurological Institute are being shared publicly to accelerate scientific discovery.
A survey of policies at major research funders found that there is room for more transparency in the process of grant review, which would strengthen the case for the efficiency of public spending on research.
This empirical paper discusses how copyright affects data mining by academic researchers.
A culture that normalizes hypercritical peers is a problem for scientists who want to reach beyond academe.
A peer reviewer's suggestion that two female researchers find "one or two male biologists" to co-author and help them strengthen a manuscript they had written and submitted to a journal has unleashed an avalanche of disbelief and disgust on Twitter today.