The Challenge of Preserving Good Data in the Age of AI
If artificial intelligence-created content floods the internet, who decides what online information is worth archiving?
Send us a link
If artificial intelligence-created content floods the internet, who decides what online information is worth archiving?
Some journal articles on the Taylor & Francis website now bear a pop-up notification stating the papers are "currently under investigation."
There remain misconceptions and blindspots in the debate around diamond open access publishing. A realistic assessment of the sustainability this approach needs an agnostic assessment of its total costs and viability as a business model.
Well ahead of a proposal by the European Commission for the next framework programme for research member states are haggling between "the friends of excellence" and countries with less-well developed research systems.
Studies have increasingly shown the widespread use of generative AI in research publications. Faced with the consequent uptick in the number of publications, Simone Ragavooloo argues that editors and reviewers should embrace AI tools to undertake the heavy lifting of statistical and methodological review and to allow them to focus on areas that require human expertise.
Embracing uncertainty could improve peer review processes.
The Research Excellence Framework is primarily a mechanism for assessing the quality of research and allocating research funding. However, REF outputs and in particularly impact case studies hold value for many actors outside of higher education institutions.
Initiative will coordinate research to “deliver significant health benefits”
To distance its science education systems from centurieslong British colonialism, India is leaning into its history and traditions—but at what cost?
Policymakers should communicate how science informs their values and priorities in weighing policy trade-offs.
Replacing research animals with tools that better mimic human biology could improve medicine.
Journalists can help scientists earn the public’s trust by pointing out when scientists are being responsive to alternative hypotheses and the public’s values.