Journals Blacklist Creator Blames University for Website Closure
Jeffrey Beall says he faced 'intense pressure' from the University of Colorado Denver and feared losing his job
Send us a link
Jeffrey Beall says he faced 'intense pressure' from the University of Colorado Denver and feared losing his job
The OA Journal Starter Kit has all the information you'll need to get a new open access journal up and running.
Jeffrey Beall is back after a five-month silence, with criticism for universities as well as fake publishers.
Bastian Greshake has analysed the full Sci-Hub corpus and found that articles are being downloaded from all over the world, more recently published papers are among the most requested, and there is a marked overrepresentation of requested articles from journals publishing on chemistry.
What results-free review might mean for authors, reviewers, editors and readers.
Why do we need middlemen in academia in the era of electronic publishing?
How academic publishing may change in the years to come.
Academic journals don’t select the research they publish on scientific rigour alone. So why aren’t academics taking to the streets about this?
We’re moving the online journal forward, and we hope you’ll join us on our journey.
Private firm says its watchlist of untrustworthy journals will be objective and transparent — but not free.
This feature enables users to update the record’s files after they have been made public and researchers to easily cite either specific versions of a record or to cite, via a top-level DOI, all the versions of a record.
Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?
In recent years, observers have noticed that articles for which an APC has been paid are not always made freely available. How pervasive is this problem?
The evolution to a high-profit industry was never planned. Academics need to make the case for lower-cost journals.
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe
The scholarly process is ridden with single points of failures at all stages.
John Wiley and Sons has announced a partnership with Overleaf, a cloud-based, collaborative authoring tool.
Papers need to include fewer claims and more proof to make the scientific literature more reliable.
Recommendations on best practice
Choices researchers can make to stop exploiting themselves and discriminating against others.
We suggest a centralized facility for submitting to journals—one that would benefit scientists and not only publishers.
With exponential increases that reached 402% over a 20-year span, the spiralling cost of these large bundles rapidly put pressure on available budgets for books and journals from smaller learned societies.
A call to simplify an overly complicated process
Louisiana State University (LSU) takes Elsevier to court in an attempt to settle a disagreement with the publisher about its $1.64 million contract.
Louisiana State University (LSU) filed a lawsuit on February 27, 2017, against international science publisher Elsevier B.V. for breach of contract resulting from the publisher’s exclusion of the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine from accessing content licensed by the LSU Libraries.
Study suggesting that journal-specific submission guidelines may encourage desirable changes in authors’ practices.
Preprints are receiving welcome attention these days for being an integral part of research communication. We announce that starting this week researchers will be able to directly submit their manuscripts to PeerJ for peer review from the popular preprint server bioRxiv.
The editors of scholarly communications are under considerable pressure as recent trends in Gold Open Access characterize them as a luxury of the past.
Is it unethical for a Publisher to extract content from an academic author and commercially benefit from the sale of this without returning any of the economic gains back to the provider of that content or his/her employer?
New eLife's GitHub account to track new software or a new algorithm when they are central to an article and to make sure that the right version of the code that was used within an article persists.