Science Is Broken
Perverse incentives and the misuse of quantitative metrics have undermined the integrity of scientific research.
Perverse incentives and the misuse of quantitative metrics have undermined the integrity of scientific research.
More than a dozen members of the editorial board at Scientific Reports have resigned after the journal decided not to retract a 2016 paper that a researcher claims plagiarized his work. As of this morning, 19 people — mostly researchers based at Johns Hopkins — had stepped down from the board.
Researchers across Europe think the design of Framework 9 is suffering from a lack of British expertise because of Brexit, according to Venki Ramakrishnan.
Researchers should recognize communities that feel over-researched and under-rewarded.
Study finds male Ph.D. candidates submit and publish papers at significantly higher rates than their female peers, even within the same institution. The majors drivers of that gap remain unclear, but one factor is that women teach more during their Ph.D. programs and men serve more often as research assistants.
Digital Science continued independence is the best way to have the biggest impact in supporting research, researchers, publishers, funders and research institutions around the world.
Patrick Vallance to take over from interim government adviser Chris Whitty from March next year.
ECNP’s Preclinical Data Forum has announced the world’s first prize of 10,000 EUR for publishing ‘negative’ scientific results.
We describe curation projects as a new category of GitHub project that collects, evaluates, and preserves resources for software developers.
Psychology initiative aims to engage dozens of laboratories around the world in large-scale studies, since the “tentative, preliminary results” produced by small studies conducted in relatively isolated laboratories “just aren’t getting the job done."
Scholars are planning an alternative site on which to network and share work.
Scientists fear a crackdown on embryo research if President Trump pays attention to scientific advances.
Leading Swedish research funder joins nonprofit coalition committing about £2.72 mio. to eLife for a 4-year period beginning in 2018.
This week, we received a press release that caught our attention: A company is releasing software it claims will write manuscripts using researchers’ data.
The active participation of the people is one of the central components of a functioning democracy. Research performed a real-world randomized experiment in the United States to understand the causal effect of news stories on increasing public discussion of a specific topic.
Recently, I have worked with a number of professional services firms committed to equality, diversity and inclusion. By Iris Bohnet.
Science could benefit from more reporting of null findings, even if the reports were briefer and had less detail than would be needed for peer review.
An easy to apply, universally comparable and fair metric to measure and report co-authors contribution in the scientific literature.
If nations and their research institutions are to produce more impactful science, they need to encourage scientists to travel, collaborate and work across borders.
Unusual experiment reveals that news stories can boost national policy discussion on social media.
What are the effects of geographical variations in personal and corporate taxes on the location decisions of innovative individuals and companies?
How do evolving forms of digital scholarship fit into the current landscape and what are the implications for publishers?
A set of scenarios produced by the School of International Futures, published here as a tool for others to use in exploring alternative futures for UK research and innovation.
Imagine succinct, up-to-date information, not for software projects but for modern research publications.