Publons Academy
Publons Academy
A practical pathway to becoming an expert reviewer.
A practical pathway to becoming an expert reviewer.
An empirical analysis of researchers’ publications reveals that females have fewer distinct coauthors yet have a lower chance of repeating previous coauthors than their male counterparts.
A court case may define the limits of anonymous scientific criticism
An unbending reward system prevents early-career researchers taking full advantage of the digital world.
How researchers are taking advantage of Twitter and other forums to do, share, and discuss research
There are big advantages to having scientists communicate in a common tongue, but there are drawbacks as well
Program of OpenCon 2016, a platform for the next generation to learn about Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data, develop critical skills, and catalyze action toward a more open system for sharing the world’s information. Held in Washington, DC on November 12-14, 2016.
A free, open source, preprints repository, api, and aggregator for arXiv, PeerJ, Research Papers in Economics, PsyArXiv, SocArXiv, engrXiv, and others.
A modern digital state needs an effective data infrastructure.
Calculation suggests papers with women first-authors have citation rates pushed down by 10%.
Podcasting can offer personal and professional benefits for researchers who want to dive in.
Computerized search of trial registry lists worst offenders.
Articles published open access are cited more often than articles that are not. End of Story.
5-year subscription access to around 1,850 journals on Elsevier’s ScienceDirect e-platform.
Exploring the research output on specific natural disasters.
Citizen science has the potential to make science and innovation more responsible, but it is not without controversy.
The European Commission and the European Investment Fund are inviting applications for setting up and managing one or more private-sector led, market-driven Pan-European Venture Capital Funds-of-Funds.
How should the scientific publication process be rethought to be more meritocratic?
Reviewers who are experts in a given field are more likely to deliver harsher critiques of papers that hit close to home, researchers report.
Civility is important in evaluating a manuscript for publication, but so is telling the truth when the paper falls short.
The knowledge that we produce in our publicly funded works belongs to humankind and must not be locked up behind pay-walls— newly submitted papers should be open-access and older ones open-archive.
Researchers may publish their best work at any point in their careers, a new study reports. This is not the same as success being the result of random forces or just plain “dumb luck.”
In an era where research bureaucracy is the biggest burden bestowed upon scientists, some are seeking practical solutions.