Meet the world’s most prolific peer reviewer
The inaugural Sentinel of Science awards aim to give peer review a bit more luster by showcasing the contributions of reviewers.
The inaugural Sentinel of Science awards aim to give peer review a bit more luster by showcasing the contributions of reviewers.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been arm-twisting journalists into relinquishing their reportorial independence, our investigation reveals. Other institutions are following suit.
Matthias Egger, internationally renowned epidemiologist and public health expert, will be the new president of the National Research Council of the SNSF as of 2017.
As part of its new 13th 5-year plan, the Chinese Academy of Sciences this month unveiled plans for a national science center...
If Zuckerberg and Chan want to get some bang for their buck, they’ll need to break down the structures that hold brilliant young scientists back
BioMed Central psychology journal will attempt to tackle publication bias by withholding research results from peer reviewers.
A torrent of low-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews in biomedicine might be hiding valuable research and misleading scientists.
A leading space scientist has accused the European Space Agency (ESA) of having a “problem with promoting women” that has led to men holding almost every top job at the agency.
We can all recognise the ambitious researcher at the conference who is anxious to advertise their own work. It resonates with my current work on academic self-promotion via university profile pages. And I start to wonder, is a new academic habitus beginning to emerge?
Citation network maps may indicate when gaming is taking place. Proving intention is a different story.
Authorea, The Winnower, and Reddit are teaming up to explore the role of social media in research and discovery. We want to hear from you, in essay form!
Around the world, poverty and social background remain huge barriers in scientific careers.
We surveyed 2,000 researchers and practitioners about what they want from academic societies; here’s what they told us.
When you open politics to the public, you get direct democracy. But what happens when you open science to the public?
That Sci-Hub’s activities are illegal is not disputed. However, according to Iván Farías Pelcastre and Flor González Correa the issue at the core of the debate is the current publishing and knowled…
Peter Gluckman and James Wilsdon: This week’s summit of the International Network for Government Science Advice will take stock of progress in using evidence and expertise to inform policy.
Researchers with a PhD who are employed by a Dutch research institution can request funding for the replication of 'cornerstone research'.
Tensions between Cuba and the United States are easing. But researchers still struggle to join the scientific world.
For the head of AstraZeneca’s genomics initiative, the challenge is not just getting the sequences, but in putting them to use — wisely.
This study investigates whether bias with single-blind review is greatest in a setting of author or institutional prestige.
Many reviewers feel that some form of public acknowledgment is more valuable than monetary payment when it comes to their services.
This article describes some of the ways that identifiers can help to unlock the potential of open research.