Philosophy and History of Open Science
A two-day conference bringing together contemporary open science advocates and scholars to discuss particular themes relevant to openness in contemporary research practice.
A two-day conference bringing together contemporary open science advocates and scholars to discuss particular themes relevant to openness in contemporary research practice.
Young researchers are having to fight harder than past generations for a smaller share of the academic pie.
The research enterprise sometimes keeps scientists from pursuing the best ideas: intense competition forces researchers to prioritize publishing papers over tackling important questions. A special issue explores the problems facing early and mid-career scientists, and how to solve them.
Demand for steady output stymies discovery. To pursue the most important research, scientists must be allowed to shift their focus.
Scientists starting labs say that they are under historically high pressure to publish, secure funding and earn permanent positions — leaving precious little time for actual research.
Over a decade has passed since the Budapest Open Access Initiative and the Berlin Declaration on Open Access. A bystander could be forgiven for thinking that the level of discussion and the apparent differences in position across higher education institutions, publishing houses, laboratories, conference halls, funder headquarters, and government buildings must mean that progress has been limited.
For some time now PLOS has discussed new initiatives designed to accelerate research communication.
Progress update from symposium sponsors: The Academy of Medical Sciences, the BBSRC, the MRC and Wellcome Trust.
Significant differences between genders which may put women at a disadvantage when pursuing an academic career in mathematics.
A computational guy’s take on the “reproducibility crisis”
The move to providing the underlying data behind research articles has been a major step towards promoting reproducibility, transparency and data re-use. However, analyses of the quality and annota…
Interview with Rusty Speidel, Marketing Director at the Center for Open Science (COS).
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research is a non-profit, independent research and educational institution known as a world leader in biomedical research.
Research used to be about the pursuit of knowledge, now it’s driven by impact and returns. The only way to survive is to change how we work
COPE has produced some guidelines which set out the basic principles and standards to which all peer reviewers should adhere during the peer-review process in research publication. The aim has been to make them generic so that they can be applied across disciplines.
Significant strides in improving public access to scholarly publications and digital data help usher in an era of open science.
Federally funded research and development (R&D) is a hallmark of the U.S. economy but, it's under siege. To maximize and make apparent the economic returns from R&D, the next administration should seek to improve the local economic impact of federal R&D.
The arXiv preprint service is trying to answer an age-old question.
Peer review publications remain a key stage in the quality assurance of new research, but some comments can be the stuff of nightmares.
A communication setting out a new strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation, in particular with a view to implementing Horizon 2020.