Young scientists need to fight for their employment rights
Like junior doctors, early career biomedical researchers have an issue with contracts (or lack of them). So why don’t we strike too?
Like junior doctors, early career biomedical researchers have an issue with contracts (or lack of them). So why don’t we strike too?
Accounting for audience gender ratio, men asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a woman.
Answers of the annual Edge.org question posed to leading thinkers and scientists.
You’ll find communities thirsty for your findings – and a space to demonstrate measurable ‘impact’ to your heart’s content.
The reality of academia is stifling the passion and creativity needed both to enjoy science, and to do it well.
Groups of authors citing each other is becoming an issue in scientific publishing. With a new approach, researchers discuss how to identify the problem.
The production, archival, and sharing of data may actually be a more effective way to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.
New citation analyses reveal a who’s who of the most impactful scientific researchers.
Rather than repealing or replacing the impact factor, its producers should rename it to reflect its intended function more accurately.
A law that aimed to stimulate the creation of spin-offs hasn't had much effect.
Discovery is the pathway to context. Context of an article is all about how research fits into increasingly complex domains, and using structured networks to decipher its value. With the power of the internet at our disposal, putting research in context should be of key importance in a world where there is ever more research being published that is impossible to manually filter.
Women outnumber men in a raft of science courses – but when they start their careers, they find many insurmountable barriers.
1. Give all scientists an annual, unconditional fixed amount of funding to conduct their research. 2. All funded scientists are obliged to donate a fixed percentage of all of the funding that they previously received to other researchers: the funding circulates through the community, converging on researchers that are expected to make the best use of it.
Why breaking down walls between different academic disciplines could enhance our understanding of why research evidence does − or doesn’t − make it into policy.
The National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health are frequently described as the world’s gold standard for scientific funding. Operationally, however, they are not keeping pace with progress at the scientific frontier.
New data shows that many Ph.D.s switch jobs and employment sectors in their early careers and even into midcareer. So Ph.D. programs should help students navigate job opportunities and understand the value of their degrees across sectors.
Grant and funding withdrawals should be considered in cases of sexual harrassment, say researchers.
Competitive agency positions offer balanced and rewarding science careers.
The hunger for these offsets is blinding us to the mounting pile of evidence that they haven't - and won't - deliver the climate benefit they promise.
Scientific papers containing lots of specialized terminology are less likely to be cited by other researchers.
A paradigm shift away from null hypothesis significance testing seems in progress. Based on simulations, the article illustrates some of the underlying motivations.
All researchers should strive to improve the quality, relevance and reliability of their work.