Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Physicists Can’t Agree on What Science Even Means Anymore

Physicists Can’t Agree on What Science Even Means Anymore

Recently, a trio of mainstream physicists accused hundreds, perhaps thousands, of other mainstream physicists of Not Doing Science.

Why We Need Centralized Services

Why We Need Centralized Services

While preprints have been around since before arXiv.org launched in 1991, fields outside of physics are starting to push for more early sharing of research data, results and conclusions.

Biology Needs More Staff Scientists

Biology Needs More Staff Scientists

Independent professionals advance science in ways faculty-run labs cannot, and such positions keep talented people in research, argues Steven Hyman.

Experts Call for ‘People Before Projects’ Revamp

Experts Call for ‘People Before Projects’ Revamp

New report from influential group recommends ditching large-scale projects in favour of funding outstanding individual researchers, getting rid of submission deadlines and awarding smaller grants to make the pie go further.

The Quantified Self and the Gamification of Academic Research Through Social Networks

The Quantified Self and the Gamification of Academic Research Through Social Networks

ResearchGate and similar services represent a “gamification” of research, drawing on features usually associated with online games, like rewards, rankings and levels.

Defining Open Peer Review

Defining Open Peer Review

Recently, our colleagues at OpenAIRE have published a systematic review of ‘Open Peer Review’ (OPR). As part of this, they defined seven consistent traits of OPR, which we thought sounded like a remarkably good opportunity to help clarify how peer review works at ScienceOpen. At ScienceOpen, we have over 31 million article records all available for …

TrueReview, A Platform for Post-Publication Peer Review

TrueReview, A Platform for Post-Publication Peer Review

We describe the mathematical foundations and structure of TrueReview, an open-source tool we propose to build in support of post-publication review.

Journal Publishers' Big Deals: Are They Worth It?

Journal Publishers' Big Deals: Are They Worth It?

With exponential increases that reached 402% over a 20-year span, the spiralling cost of these large bundles rapidly put pressure on available budgets for books and journals from smaller learned societies.

Sci-Hub Study Suggests Publishers’ Embargoes ‘Not Viable’

Sci-Hub Study Suggests Publishers’ Embargoes ‘Not Viable’

Analysis of scholarly publishing’s ‘Napster’ shows that academics are not prepared to wait to access research. 35 per cent of articles downloaded from Sci-Hub were less than two years old when they were accessed.

NIH to Cap Grants for Well-Funded Investigators

NIH to Cap Grants for Well-Funded Investigators

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced plans last week to impose a new grant scoring system that would cap how much support an investigator can receive from the agency.

Artificial Intelligence Can Expedite Scientific Communication and Eradicate Bias From the Publishing Process

Artificial Intelligence Can Expedite Scientific Communication and Eradicate Bias From the Publishing Process

Although automated publishing would allow researchers to share their findings faster, while also removing human bias, there are obvious ethical dilemmas related to this dehumanisation of the process.

People Don't Trust Scientific Research When Companies Are Involved

People Don't Trust Scientific Research When Companies Are Involved

Scientists need funding to do their work. But a new study finds turning to industry partners taints perceptions of university research, and including other kinds of partners doesn't really help.

For Sharing A Scientific Paper, a Young Researcher Faces Jail Time

For Sharing A Scientific Paper, a Young Researcher Faces Jail Time

The case of Colombian scientist Diego Gomez — on trial for copyright violation for sharing a research paper — is likely to reach a head later this month.

Star Neuroscientist Tom Insel Leaves the Google-Spawned Verily for … a Startup?

Star Neuroscientist Tom Insel Leaves the Google-Spawned Verily for … a Startup?

Add another high-profile departure to the list of people leaving Verily, the Google-spawned health science company: Thomas Insel, a neuroscientist and former head of the National Institutes of Mental Health who was leading Verily’s mental health initiatives.

Science Publishers Try New Tack to Combat Unauthorized Paper Sharing

Science Publishers Try New Tack to Combat Unauthorized Paper Sharing

Rise in copyright breaches prompts industry to discuss ways to allow ‘fair sharing’ of articles.