The Gender Bias in Peer Reviewing Reveals the Sexism in Academia
Even women researchers are more likely to choose men to review their academic papers.
Send us a link
Even women researchers are more likely to choose men to review their academic papers.
Do popular science articles make the public overconfident about their own expertise?
For those interested in knowing what is in the world around them, the current news is disgusting. All US Environmental Protection Agency grants have been frozen, and employees are being prohibited from discussing the changes or talking to the public.
The Trump administration has imposed a freeze on grants and contracts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. scientists wait anxiously for the new administration to flesh out its policies.
The 2017 Innovative Seed Grant Program is accepting proposals for interdisciplinary ventures on the CU Boulder campus, due Feb. 12. The program has set aside $1 million to fund grants of up to $50,000 each.
Discussing the Future of Academic Publishing.
Academic life is particularly full of rank ordered lists, even if they are frequently not transparently available.
Meta.ai is joining the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
He also immediately suspended all Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracts and grants.
Meet the former Enron trader and hedge fund founder who's on a quest to expose bad science.
As privatized platforms like Academia.edu look to monetize scholarly writing even further, researchers, scientists and academics across the globe must now consider alternatives to proprietary companies that aim to profit from our writing and offer little transparency as to how our work will be used in the future.
Does that mean the original research was wrong? No. It means science is really, really hard.
Open-science advocate says journals should be clearer to peer-reviewers about terms and conditions.
Please cosign the statement below if you think the NIH should give scientists the option of using preprints as evidence of productivity in grant applications, following the recent policies of the Wellcome Trust, MRC, HFSP, Simons Foundation, and Helmsley Foundation.
Scientists ponder functionality of open science approach in the wake of Tanenbaum Open Science Institute announcement
Cut-throat atmosphere in world-class labs and conferences closer to House of Cards than Big Bang Theory, says Swiss academic
A publication that shows that many approaches in neuroscience, when used naïvely, fall short of producing a meaningful understanding.
Vaccines work, climate change is real — and scientists’ tweets for the Trump administration.
Letter from the Dutch State Secretary for Education, Culture and Science informing the House of Representatives of the progress made in the field of open science.
Traditional values will not serve us well when it comes to debating the ethics of novel technologies such as self-driving cars. We need a new moral code.
A leading website that monitored predatory open access journals has closed. This will make it harder to keep tabs on this corrosive force within science.
A geneticist's decision not to publish his finalized preprint in a journal gets support from scientists online.
A project that tried to reproduce the results of 50 landmark papers turned into an arduous slog—and that’s a problem in itself.