Predicting Future Research
To predict what research will be transformative, a crystal ball might be your best option.
Send us a link
To predict what research will be transformative, a crystal ball might be your best option.
A set of scenarios produced by the School of International Futures, published here as a tool for others to use in exploring alternative futures for UK research and innovation.
Imagine succinct, up-to-date information, not for software projects but for modern research publications.
What are the effects of geographical variations in personal and corporate taxes on the location decisions of innovative individuals and companies?
How do evolving forms of digital scholarship fit into the current landscape and what are the implications for publishers?
Science could benefit from more reporting of null findings, even if the reports were briefer and had less detail than would be needed for peer review.
An easy to apply, universally comparable and fair metric to measure and report co-authors contribution in the scientific literature.
If nations and their research institutions are to produce more impactful science, they need to encourage scientists to travel, collaborate and work across borders.
Unusual experiment reveals that news stories can boost national policy discussion on social media.
The active participation of the people is one of the central components of a functioning democracy. Research performed a real-world randomized experiment in the United States to understand the causal effect of news stories on increasing public discussion of a specific topic.
Investigating the implementation of data management and sharing requirements within development research projects.
Scholars are planning an alternative site on which to network and share work.
Scientists fear a crackdown on embryo research if President Trump pays attention to scientific advances.
Leading Swedish research funder joins nonprofit coalition committing about £2.72 mio. to eLife for a 4-year period beginning in 2018.
When women are unleashed on the tech world, new ways of living and doing business reveal themselves.
Patrick Vallance to take over from interim government adviser Chris Whitty from March next year.
ECNP’s Preclinical Data Forum has announced the world’s first prize of 10,000 EUR for publishing ‘negative’ scientific results.
Psychology initiative aims to engage dozens of laboratories around the world in large-scale studies, since the “tentative, preliminary results” produced by small studies conducted in relatively isolated laboratories “just aren’t getting the job done."
In our institutions of higher education and our research labs, scholars first produce, then buy back, their own content. With the costs rising and access restricted, something's got to give.
This week, we received a press release that caught our attention: A company is releasing software it claims will write manuscripts using researchers’ data.
Perverse incentives and the misuse of quantitative metrics have undermined the integrity of scientific research.
A review found them all flawed. Scientists who deny climate change are not modern-day Galileos.
More than a dozen members of the editorial board at Scientific Reports have resigned after the journal decided not to retract a 2016 paper that a researcher claims plagiarized his work. As of this morning, 19 people — mostly researchers based at Johns Hopkins — had stepped down from the board.
Researchers across Europe think the design of Framework 9 is suffering from a lack of British expertise because of Brexit, according to Venki Ramakrishnan.
Researchers should recognize communities that feel over-researched and under-rewarded.