Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Pre-print Open Access Site arXiv Surpasses Billion Download Mark

Pre-print Open Access Site arXiv Surpasses Billion Download Mark

The pre-print database for scientists to test the peer-review waters was set up in 1991 as a relatively simple electronic bulletin board on a single computer. Twenty-six years later, the site arXiv.org has surpassed a full billion downloads of papers and receives more than 10 million submissions each month.

Can Science Save Humanity? The Debate Between HG Wells and George Orwell Is Still Relevant Today

Can Science Save Humanity? The Debate Between HG Wells and George Orwell Is Still Relevant Today

There is no shortage of problems facing humankind. What role science has in tackling them has long been debated.

Fallibility in Science: Responding to Errors in the Work of Oneself and Others

Fallibility in Science: Responding to Errors in the Work of Oneself and Others

For science to progress, we have to accept the inevitability of error.

Reply to Arguelles and Arguelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?"

Reply to Arguelles and Arguelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?"

The preoccupation with journal IF is generated by the scientists comprising the review committees responsible for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.

Precision Medical Treatments Have A Quality Control Problem

Precision Medical Treatments Have A Quality Control Problem

The goal is to customize treatments for cancer and other diseases to a patient's own biology. But something as simple as failing to take care of tissue samples en route to the lab can derail that.

The Replication Crisis in Science

The Replication Crisis in Science

There have been two distinct responses to the replication crisis – by instituting measures like registered reports and by making data openly available. But another group continues to remain in denial.

There Is No Ban on Words at the CDC. But What’s Actually Happening to Science Is Scarier.

There Is No Ban on Words at the CDC. But What’s Actually Happening to Science Is Scarier.

They’re not hiding behind language - they’re acting in plain sight.

The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact

The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact

International collaboration improves the impact of average research papers, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.

Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds

Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds

Towards a fully-fledged policy proposal, including issues of cost and fairness.

Scientists Tainted by Misconduct of Former Collaborators

Scientists Tainted by Misconduct of Former Collaborators

The stigma has a punitive effect on citations for prior collaborators of fraudulent researchers.

US Government Lifts Ban on Risky Pathogen Research

US Government Lifts Ban on Risky Pathogen Research

The National Institutes of Health will again fund research that makes viruses more dangerous.

Evidence From Peer Review That Women Are Held to Higher Standards

Evidence From Peer Review That Women Are Held to Higher Standards

Tougher editorial standards and/or biased referee assignment may force women to write better, and may also reduce their productivity.

Female Grant Applicants Are Equally Successful When Peer Reviewers Assess the Science, but Not When They Assess the Scientist

Female Grant Applicants Are Equally Successful When Peer Reviewers Assess the Science, but Not When They Assess the Scientist

Gender gaps in grant success rates were significantly larger when there was an explicit review focus on the principal investigator.