Affordable Open Access: There's a Way, Now We Need a Will
What will it take to make the majority of scholarship open access so anyone can read it without a paywall?
Send us a link
What will it take to make the majority of scholarship open access so anyone can read it without a paywall?
The potential of preprints to drive scientific understanding and innovation, and even support good journalism.
After much investigation and active measures, we can state that the DOAJ is effectively under attack from an unknown third party.
We need to start talking about what kind of planet we want to live on.
The Open Science movement champions transparency, but how much and how quickly is a matter of dispute.
University manipulated test scores for more than a decade to ensure more men became doctors.
In a slightly depressing new paper, researchers describe how they tried to get access to the data behind 111 of the most cited psychology and psychiatry papers published in the past decade. Only 14% of the datasets were made available with no restrictions on who could access them.
Students from Saudi Arabia studying Canada are have been ordered by their government to leave the country in the middle of their courses.
Withdrawal is ordered as part of larger diplomatic spat over Canadian criticism of Saudi arrests of human rights activists.
I want to see whether the wisdom of crowds does a better job than conventional grant review at supporting research, says Johan Bollen.
Smaller countries rely more on regional collaborations than on domestic interaction.
Spurred by a recent report on sexual harassment in academia, our columnist revisits a historical case and reflects on what has changed - and what hasn’t.
Citizen science: crowdsourcing for systematic reviews looks at how people can contribute their expertise to scientific studies using new online platforms - even if they don’t think of themselves as researchers or scientists.
A fresh, practical look at how diversity impacts on engineering and strategies for change.
Publons’ ECR Reviewer Choice Award celebrates early-career researchers' exceptional contribution to peer review, recognizing an individual who has been influential in the realm of peer review or has significantly contributed to improving the system.
In this controversial opinion piece, German science expert Stefan Hornbostel argues that some transparency is good for science - but too much can backfire, reducing the efficiency and quality of research and eroding public trust.
Thanks to a major new international research study, it's no longer possible to pretend that predatory journals are not a serious problem that needs serious attention.
Choosing wisely from a burgeoning array of digital tools can help researchers to record experiments with ease.
A Kurdish refugee whose top mathematics prize was stolen minutes after he received the honor this week in Rio de Janeiro will get a replacement medal Saturday, organizers said.
A novel set of text- and citation-based metrics that can be used to identify high-impact and transformative works. The 11 metrics can be grouped into seven types: Radical-Generative, Radical-Destructive, Risky, Multidisciplinary, Wide Impact, Growing Impact, and Impact (overall).
The first OpenCon satellite event in Switzerland will take place on September 21-22 at the SNSF in Bern. Registrations are open until the end of August.
The problem with peer review is that, despite its rigor, it suffers from bias because reviewers are competing for the same recognition and resources.