The Important Thing is Not to Win, It is to Take Part
What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?
Send us a link
What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?
The nonprofit's Summer Immersion Program aims to catch girls before their interest in computer science plummets.
We need to start talking about what kind of planet we want to live on.
After much investigation and active measures, we can state that the DOAJ is effectively under attack from an unknown third party.
The Open Science movement champions transparency, but how much and how quickly is a matter of dispute.
University manipulated test scores for more than a decade to ensure more men became doctors.
In a slightly depressing new paper, researchers describe how they tried to get access to the data behind 111 of the most cited psychology and psychiatry papers published in the past decade. Only 14% of the datasets were made available with no restrictions on who could access them.
I want to see whether the wisdom of crowds does a better job than conventional grant review at supporting research, says Johan Bollen.
Students from Saudi Arabia studying Canada are have been ordered by their government to leave the country in the middle of their courses.
Withdrawal is ordered as part of larger diplomatic spat over Canadian criticism of Saudi arrests of human rights activists.
Spurred by a recent report on sexual harassment in academia, our columnist revisits a historical case and reflects on what has changed - and what hasn’t.
Citizen science: crowdsourcing for systematic reviews looks at how people can contribute their expertise to scientific studies using new online platforms - even if they don’t think of themselves as researchers or scientists.
Smaller countries rely more on regional collaborations than on domestic interaction.
Publons’ ECR Reviewer Choice Award celebrates early-career researchers' exceptional contribution to peer review, recognizing an individual who has been influential in the realm of peer review or has significantly contributed to improving the system.
In this controversial opinion piece, German science expert Stefan Hornbostel argues that some transparency is good for science - but too much can backfire, reducing the efficiency and quality of research and eroding public trust.
Thanks to a major new international research study, it's no longer possible to pretend that predatory journals are not a serious problem that needs serious attention.
Choosing wisely from a burgeoning array of digital tools can help researchers to record experiments with ease.
A fresh, practical look at how diversity impacts on engineering and strategies for change.
Summarizing the literature on predatory journals, describing its epidemiological characteristics, and extracting empirical descriptions of potential characteristics of predatory journals.
Here we pay tribute to some of the most courageous, innovative, and determined genius female inventors while we walk through their remarkable discoveries and try to imagine how hard it was for them at times.
To what extent does the academic research field of evaluative citation analysis confer legitimacy to research assessment as a professional practice?
Even at companies run by prominent women — where it seems that gender diversity has made great strides — why is a female leader hardly ever replaced by another woman?