A Methodological Systematic Review of 'Spin'
More than 26 percent of papers identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses contained spin. This figure rose to up to 84 percent in papers reporting on nonrandomised trials.
Send us a link
More than 26 percent of papers identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses contained spin. This figure rose to up to 84 percent in papers reporting on nonrandomised trials.
Emojis, smartphone technologies and revamped guidelines would boost transparency at scientific meetings, say Shai D. Silberberg and colleagues.
Scientists are required to communicate science and research not only to other experts in the field, but also to scientists and experts from other fields, as well as to the public and policymakers. One fundamental suggestion when communicating with non-experts is to avoid professional jargon.
U.S. adults see scientists as intelligent, but not always warm. This is a problem because people's perceptions of scientists' warmth influence their trust in scientific information. Could scientists be improving trust via social media?
From an audio version of a peer-reviewed journal to 60-second crash courses, these are the best science podcasts.
Climate change is the perfect example of how a cut-and-dry scientific issue can become controversial if it is represented consistently in partisan terms. Let’s not drag funding into the fray as well.
Our work helps answer some of society's greatest challenges, but it's usually conveyed with technical language in journals most citizens never see.
Facts are the science world’s stock-in-trade, but in an era of fake news it is ever more important to build public trust by avoiding exaggerated claims and jargon.
The right approach and a little extra effort will help improve your scientific literacy.
A new book by actor Alan Alda is all about communication — and miscommunication — between doctors, scientists and civilians.
The time that you’re absolutely sick of saying it is about the time that your target audience has heard it for the first time.
Report urges academy to ‘embrace’ opportunities for wider research dissemination
The winning entries from the first SNSF Scientific Image Competition offer a view of science that is aesthetic, nuanced and complex.
We all love science when it’s making life better, longer and easier. It’s a much harder sell when it points to inconvenient truths about our way of life
Funding shortfalls at the luxe science magazine have left some contributors waiting months to be paid. They may need to wait a little longer.
A culture that normalizes hypercritical peers is a problem for scientists who want to reach beyond academe.
In an exclusive video with WIRED, Wales said he wants Wikitribune to 'bring the fact-based, fact-checking mentality we know from Wikipedia to news'
Scientists need to learn how to communicate science strategically.
Opinion piece by Ijad Madisch, co-founder and CEO of ResearchGate, the professional network that connects the world of science and opens research up to all.
With so many scholarly communications tools and technologies now available, how do academics decide which are most appropriate for their research?
Technology, greed, a lack of clear rules and norms, hyper-competitiveness and a certain amount of corruption have resulted in confusion and anarchy in the world of scientific communication.
Papers from 2015 are a tougher read than some from the nineteenth century — and the problem isn't just about words, says Philip Ball.
These are the 2017 winners of the Vizzies Challenge.
Popular-audience science writing are more concerned with what we don't know than what we do.
A visual interface that dramatically increases the visibility of research findings for science and society alike.
The trend is indicative of a growing usage of general scientific jargon.
A beautiful new way to create and share research figures.
Very few academics do a great deal to share their often important and relevant research with the general public. What's holding them back?