publications

Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions

Researchers acting to maximise their fitness should spend most of their effort seeking novel results and conduct small studies that have only 10%–40% statistical power. As a result, half of the studies they publish will report erroneous conclusions. Current incentive structures are in conflict with maximising the scientific value of research; we suggest ways that the scientific ecosystem could be improved.

Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender

Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender

An empirical analysis of researchers’ publications reveals that females have fewer distinct coauthors yet have a lower chance of repeating previous coauthors than their male counterparts.

The Politics of Evidence

The Politics of Evidence

A new book provides new insights into the nature of political bias with regards to evidence and critically considers what an ‘improved’ use of evidence would look like from a policymaking perspective.

Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts

Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts

The increase of the fraction of papers authored by women is slowest in the most prestigious journals.

Maximizing the Local Economic Impact of Federal R&D

Maximizing the Local Economic Impact of Federal R&D

Federally funded research and development (R&D) is a hallmark of the U.S. economy but, it's under siege. To maximize and make apparent the economic returns from R&D, the next administration should seek to improve the local economic impact of federal R&D.

COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

COPE has produced some guidelines which set out the basic principles and standards to which all peer reviewers should adhere during the peer-review process in research publication. The aim has been to make them generic so that they can be applied across disciplines.

The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics

The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics

Significant differences between genders which may put women at a disadvantage when pursuing an academic career in mathematics.

The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications

The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications

On the importance of identifying variables explaining the underlying differences in individual reviewer decision-making.

Ten Simple Rules for Digital Data Storage

Ten Simple Rules for Digital Data Storage

This article describes ten simple rules for digital data storage that grew out of a long discussion among instructors for the Software and Data Carpentry initiatives.

Avoiding Obscure Topics and Generalising Findings

Avoiding Obscure Topics and Generalising Findings

A word frequency analysis of 874,411 English article titles to assess the likelihood that research on obscure (rarely researched) topics is less cited.

European Countries are Reaping the Benefits

European Countries are Reaping the Benefits

How do European countries use open data? Who are the trend setters? And what impact does open data have on our economy & society? A first report looked at Open Data Maturity and Readiness.

Is the Nobel Prize good for science?

Is the Nobel Prize good for science?

The Nobel Prize epitomizes the winner-takes-all economics of credit allocation and distorts the history of science by personalizing discoveries that are truly made by groups of individuals.