Undue burdens
Proposed controls on foreign operations in China are a threat to scientific collaboration.
Proposed controls on foreign operations in China are a threat to scientific collaboration.
The last few weeks have been a momentum time in the sciences: not because of a breakthrough in gene therapy or quantum computing, but because world leaders have twice called for scientific papers to be made freely available to all.
Researchers must seek out others’ deposited biological sequences in community databases, urges Franziska Denk.
Analysis suggests that male physicists and mathematicians author nearly 50% more papers than female colleagues.
Research institutions should explicitly seek job candidates who can be frankly self-critical of their work, says Jeffrey Flier.
Papers describing acid-bath technique under more scrutiny after institute’s investigation finds errors in methodology
A new study from Oxford University Press further documents the decline of reference resources, a category of scholarly material more than ready for an innovative era in its evolution.
Giving the same information to multiple scientific teams can lead to very different conclusions, a report published today in Nature shows.
Climate skeptics, conspiracy theorists, and the anti-immunization movement are on the rise. At the same time, fraudulent research and issues with the replicability of scientific results prompt the question if science is still a reliable source for political decision-making.
Would we worry a little more about academic freedom—about his right to hold an unpopular view and still be a member of the academic community?
The future of automated scientific writing is upon us—and that's a good thing.
A new JAMA study found the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is silent on matters of scientific misconduct and fraud.
Data from several lines of evidence suggest that the methodological quality of scientific experiments does not increase with increasing rank of the journal.
As privatized platforms like Academia.edu look to monetize scholarly writing even further, researchers, scientists and academics across the globe must now consider alternatives to proprietary companies that aim to profit from our writing and offer little transparency as to how our work will be used in the future.
The open access movement has prompted a shift towards retention of rights and the use of creative commons licenses to control how works are used by publishers. However, in many cases, researchers continue to agree to standard assignment terms offered by publishers without fully investigating or understanding them.
US scientists should not be placated by the ‘flat budget’ myth. Funds are decreasing, and the situation will get worse.
Taking an unconventional route after studying for a doctorate should not be seen as a failure, says Fiona Whelan
She was a physicist, too—and there is evidence that she contributed significantly to his groundbreaking science.
Scientific research is awesome-we read it, we build upon it, we innovate with it, and we love it. But the process of getting research from the scientists who spend months or years with their data to the academics who want to read it can be messy.
The PDF makes reading science research even more difficult and prevents a two-way conversation from taking place.
How centralization of journals led to the serials crisis and why democratizing digital journal publishing using services is the key to fixing it.
One hundred and fifteen scientists have signed an open letter to the AAAS expressing concerns over the launch of a new scientific journal, Science Advances.
Who reads science blogs, and why? This broad question started this Experiment.com project, and now the results are in.
The curbs echo what happened in Canada six years ago.
Springer Nature, the publisher of science magazines Nature and Scientific American, cancelled its 3.2 billion euro (2.8 billion pound) stock market flotation planned for Wednesday on weak investor demand, dealing a heavy blow to Germany's vibrant IPO season.
If funding applications were made under open access, science would benefit from more universal scrutiny.