The science of citations
Because the odds that a single paper will spread a good idea are simply too small. Three is good. Four is better. Five is much better.
Send us a link
Because the odds that a single paper will spread a good idea are simply too small. Three is good. Four is better. Five is much better.
Collection of literature, presentations, posts and links on reproducible research resulting from a recent Hackathon on open science.
The production, archival, and sharing of data may actually be a more effective way to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.
Was die Britin Sarah Springman anpackt, macht sie zu Gold. Nun soll sie Rektorin der ETH werden.
A European Union-sponsored university ranking system has gone live after around six years of development.
Roughly 90% of researchers in a recent survey said scientists and policymakers don't communicate enough. But, only about 60% said they were sure of the names of their elected federal representatives.
Erstes Monitoring über alle Aktivitäten auf Schweizer Plattformen zeigt, dass Crowdfunding auch in der Schweiz immer beliebter wird. Gemäss der Studie hat sich das gesammelte Geldvolumen im vergangenen Jahr mehr als verdoppelt.
Demand for ERC Starting Grants stabilizes after Switzerland being not eligible for the first time.
In "Falling Behind?" Michael Teitelbaum describes how the "hog cycle" phenomenon played out in the U.S. science and engineering workforce from the end of World War II through the 1998–2005 doubling of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget and subsequent leveling off of funding.
Launch of METRICS, the Meta-Research Innovation Centre at Stanford, by John Ioannidis.
How this money is invested could make a huge difference to our future, in the UK and to some extent beyond
Discoveries by laypeople are rare but free access to research results would increase the likelihood
Study showing that the fate of a career strongly depends from the first two affiliations.
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.
The intent of this program is to enable the general public to distinguish between an educated opinion and a random comment without a background related to the topic.
Paper challenging the perception of citations as an objective, socially unbiased measure of scientific success.
At the frontiers of scientific discovery, there is a growing problem. Can we still trust our scientists?
Academics have internalised research assessment to such a degree that the effects may be irreversible.
The Open Access Button is seeking £20,000 of funding for Version 2.0 of the tool, which is planned for launch in this October's Open Access Week.
The EU Commission will consider improving Switzerland's status under Horizon 2020, following the announcement by the Swiss government of a plan to facilitate the immigration of Croatian nationals.
At the new Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, or Metrics, John P.A. Ioannidis and Steven N. Goodman, both professors of medicine at Stanford, plan to study how research is done, and how it can be done better.
The Wellcome Trust and the RCUK plan to pilot a streamlined endorsement process to make it easier for outstanding international researchers to obtain Tier 1 Exceptional Talent or Exceptional Promise visas.
A new independent report for CaSE shows that investing public money in science and engineering is good for the economy. [14][two page briefing]
Chief Executive of the ESPRC, has no regrets over the introduction of the council's exercise which prioritises funding according to UK strength and national importance.
Comment on the paper Predicting publication success for biologists.
An article on what is needed for personalized medicine to be reality. "Research into how genetic variants can guide successful treatments must become part of routine medical practice and records", says Geoffrey Ginsburg.
At some point we must decide whether we want excellent science or nationally representative science.
Instructors at 259 US institutions were, on average, more likely to respond to fake email requests for mentoring if the senders' names sounded white and male.
By Goodman A, Pepe A, Blocker AW, Borgman CL, Cranmer K, et al. (2014).