World Reputation Rankings 2016
The opinions of others are key to creating or damaging an institution's reputation
Send us a link
The opinions of others are key to creating or damaging an institution's reputation
A broader understanding of 'impact' could help governments to measure the diverse benefits of their investment in research.
Canadian scientists are now allowed to speak out about their work — and the government policy that had restricted communications.
The problem of bias in published research must be tackled in a consistent and comprehensive fashion, says Adam G. Dunn.
Following their February breakthrough, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, Ronald Drever and nearly 1,000 LIGO scientists will share the Silicon Valley-backed prize.
Launch of Research Integrity and Peer Review, a new open-access journal that will provide a home to research on ethics, reporting, and evaluation of research.
However, director of the Oxford Martin School says 'disciplinary silos' were one factor contributing to 2008 financial crisis
Not a scientist? As David Lang shows, you can still play a meaningful role in solving science’s hardest problems.
As long men can score points for producing mountains of output, women will never get a fair shot at academic promotion
The scientific community must do a better job confronting the issues facing women in science, our author writes
After hundreds of manipulated images were detected across 40 scientific journals, the real work will be to correct the scientific record.
Breaking down lengthy, narrative-driven biomedical articles into brief reports on singular observations or experiments could increase reproducibility and accessibility in the literature.
We can all recognise the ambitious researcher at the conference who is anxious to advertise their own work while affecting interest in the keynote speaker’s presentation. It resonates with my current work on academic self-promotion via university profile pages. And I start to wonder, is a new academic habitus is beginning to emerge?
Retractions are on the rise. But reams of flawed research papers persist in the scientific literature. Is it time to change the way papers are published?
A Princeton professor’s frankness hides the grim reality about work for many young people
An analysis reveals that the text contents of the scientific papers generally change very little from their pre-print to final published versions.
Johannes Haushofer bravely posts document listing degree programs he did not get in to and academic positions he did not get
Billionaires are funding lots of grandiose plans. Welcome their ambition
Shannon had a weakness for juggling and unicycles, but his fingerprints are on every electronic device we own.
Carlo Doglioni aims to concentrate on science, leaving trial and corruption allegations behind
A new analysis finds that 3.8 percent of scientific studies have images duplicated from another paper.
Science magazine just published a great piece on the utility of Sci-Hub. Unfortunately, its defense of its own business model is flawed.