It’s silly to assume all research funded by corporations is bent
If the work is properly monitored, there is no reason not to trust the results
Send us a link
If the work is properly monitored, there is no reason not to trust the results
Launched twenty years ago this week, EurekAlert has tracked, and in some ways shaped, the way science is covered in the digital era.
When PLoS announced its data policy that all data should be made publicly available, everyone applauded. It was a big step toward an open science and data sharing.
Scientists are now contemplating the fabrication of a human genome, meaning they would use chemicals to manufacture all the DNA contained in human chromosomes.
All they needed to be more open with their data was the promise of a badge showing they did it.
Half a billion dollars are being pledged to study the microbes in humans, crops, soils, oceans, and more.
A group of researchers has released a data set on nearly 70,000 users of the online dating site OkCupid. The data dump breaks the cardinal rule of social science research ethics: It took identifiable personal data without permission.
By sharing their experiences, early-career scientists can help to make the case for increased government funding for researchers.
Entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley live by the motto of “Fail fast, fail often." Scientists would do well to likewise embrace failure.
Imagine what would happen if the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in the referendum of the 23rd June 2016? To give our readers a better idea of the consequences of the Brexit for the country's scientists, EuroScientist has commissioned UK technology journalist Paul Hill to write a fictional day in the life of a British academic post-Brexit. This gives food for thought on the factors influencing the position of Europe's centre of gravity in research.
Reputational assessments of scientists were based more on how they pursue knowledge and respond to replication evidence, not whether the initial results were true.
In the fiercely competitive world of drug discovery and development, secrecy is no longer as important as it once was.
Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census
What could a Brexit mean for the United Kingdom’s higher education, research and student mobility? Switzerland offers some clues. ...
A recent paper claims that the quality of researchers declines with age. Five senior scientists consider the data and how they’ve contributed through the years.
In science as in politics, most people agree that transparency is essential. Top journals now require authors to disclose their funding sources so that readers can judge the possibility of bias, and the British Medical Journal recently required authors to disclose their data as well so that experts can run independent analyses of the results. But as transparency becomes the standard, many academics are resisting the trend without pushback from their universities.
Ever since Reagan and Thatcher made neoliberal ideas palatable to an unsuspecting public, concepts such as “New Public Management” or the more general notion that competition between in…
JournalReviewer is an independent site that aggregates information users provide about their experience with academic journals' review processes.
A crowdfunding project to give insights into one possible aspect of gender bias in mathematics.
Scientists must publish less, or good research will be swamped by the ever-increasing volume of poor work.
Top speakers announced at the next EuroScience Open Forum 2016, held in Manchester this summer (July 24-27).
Document submitted to the Italian Senate criticizes institute that will oversee a €1.5-billion project.
Open competitions bring new minds, skills and collaborations to problems in biomedical research.
Female Ph.D.s in science and engineering earn 31 percent less than their male cohorts one year after graduation, according to a new study in American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. When controlling for the fact that women tend to earn degrees in fields that pay less than those in which more men earn degrees, the observed gap dropped to 11 percent. And the gap disappeared when controlling for whether the women were married and had children.