Cooperation And Liaison Between Universities And Editors (CLUE)
Recommendations on best practice
Send us a link
Recommendations on best practice
Some of the world’s largest research funders and NGOs today agreed to adopt the WHO's strong standards on clinical trial transparency.
Investment also planned in artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and other fields.
An amusing case of plagiarism in a paper about plagiarism.
Relying just on numbers to assess gender equality is insufficient because companies and researchers are smart enough to game the system.
Charlie Rapple highlights the case of Diego Gómez, a Columbian researcher facing prison for sharing someone else's thesis via Scribd.
A team of researchers suggest that the increasing complexity of managing data may be one reason that reproducibility has fallen off.
The imprimatur bestowed by peer review has a history that is both shorter and more complex than many scientists realize.
Independent professionals advance science in ways faculty-run labs cannot, and such positions keep talented people in research, argues Steven Hyman.
While preprints have been around since before arXiv.org launched in 1991, fields outside of physics are starting to push for more early sharing of research data, results and conclusions.
ResearchGate and similar services represent a “gamification” of research, drawing on features usually associated with online games, like rewards, rankings and levels.
A brief summary of the main citation indicators used today.
Choices researchers can make to stop exploiting themselves and discriminating against others.
Recently, our colleagues at OpenAIRE have published a systematic review of ‘Open Peer Review’ (OPR). As part of this, they defined seven consistent traits of OPR, which we thought sounded like a remarkably good opportunity to help clarify how peer review works at ScienceOpen. At ScienceOpen, we have over 31 million article records all available for …
A list of people to follow on the preprints subject.
Government may delay decision pending court decisions.
Which platforms exist? Does it work? And what is funded?
One in three scholars in field ‘deeply concerned’ about future research career prospects
An intellectual free-for-all doesn’t lead to the common ground on which research can build.
Analysis of scholarly publishing’s ‘Napster’ shows that academics are not prepared to wait to access research. 35 per cent of articles downloaded from Sci-Hub were less than two years old when they were accessed.
What policymakers want from scientists, and what were the implications for synthesising evidence in ways that meet policy needs?
Although automated publishing would allow researchers to share their findings faster, while also removing human bias, there are obvious ethical dilemmas related to this dehumanisation of the process.
The STM Association Future Labs Committee explores the technology trends that will impact scholarly publishing by 2021.
Technologist argues that artificial intelligence could make publishing decisions in milliseconds.