Plan S - Time to Decide What We Stand for
Reflections on the recent consultation period for Plan S, a funder led proposal for achieving universal open access to research papers.
Send us a link
Reflections on the recent consultation period for Plan S, a funder led proposal for achieving universal open access to research papers.
Five junior researchers share their thoughts on travel barriers.
The giants of the scientific publishing industry have made huge profits for decades. Now they are under threat.
ReimagineReview records trials that are probing the pros and cons of different approaches to review.
Meetings of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vaccine committee have become the latest front in a national battle over immunization.
The University of California has broken with one of the world's largest academic publishers. Is this the end of a very profitable business model?
When we reject failure, we create a culture of punishment, artificial rewards, and scientific bias. There are people running analyses and experiments right now which others will have undoubtedly done before, but just not communicated their results.
CROCI, the Crowdsourced Open Citations Index, is a new OpenCitations Index containing citations deposited by individuals, identified by ORCiD identifiers, who have a legal right to publish them under a CC0 public domain waiver.
Time and time again, academic publishers have managed to create the impression that publishing incurs a lot of costs which justify the outrageous prices they charge, even though it is well established that the cost of making an article public with all the bells and whistles that come with an academic article is between US$/€200-500.
The move could aid a global movement for immediate free access to scientific articles.
University of California and Dutch publisher fail to strike deal that would allow researchers to publish under open-access terms.
Happy Open Data Day 2019! It's that special day of the year again! Well, every day should be Open Data Day, but today lots of motivated folk come together around the world to remind us all why Open Data, Open Science, and sharing of data and science in general is better for everyone. Better for reuse, better for tracking public money flows, better for open mapping and development, and also, lest we lost sight, better for the researcher who produced the data! Why better for the researchers who generated the data? Better because the value add from sharing is multifold. Others can reuse and reanalyse your data. If you've placed the data in a repository with a persistent identifier, you'll get attributed when they are reused and you can get credit for this - and even citations. What may not be immediately obvious is that taking a little bit of time to ensure your data are 'sharable' is good practise that ensures that when you want to use
The proportion of open-access publications with authors from the pharmaceutical industry doubled between 2009 and 2016.
The UC system, the largest public academic system in the US, just dropped its $10 million-a-year subscription to the world's largest publisher of academic journals.
As departure day approaches, chief of top UK lab says he fears science will drop off the government's agenda.
University Librarian and Professor Jeffrey MacKie-Mason talks about why UC split with the academic publisher.
In creating a new innovation council, the European Commission is experimenting not just in policy but also in management.
As a leader in the global movement toward open access to publicly funded research, the University of California is taking a firm stand by deciding not to renew its subscriptions with Elsevier. Despite months of contract negotiations, Elsevier was unwilling to meet UC's key goal: securing universal open access to UC research while containing the rapidly escalating costs associated with for-profit journals.
Thanks largely to the strong performance of ETH Zurich, the Swiss university system has entered the top three globally in the latest QS rankings.
A pilot project representing the first significant experiment with the syndication of publisher content to a content supercontinent.
Implications for the scholarly publishing landscape
Scientists now know more about what makes Lil Bub such a unique feline.
Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. There is a clear need for best practice guidelines for implementation.
The Open Access Escape Room resulted in great engagement from students, academic staff and professional services staff, some of whom reported that they never knew how relevant OA was for them. It increased engagement and provided a positive environment for conversations around OA.
Six male researchers describe their efforts to support their female colleagues.
Women are underrepresented relative to men as colloquium speakers, yet women neither decline talk invitations at greater rates nor question the importance of talks more than men do.