These Are the Best Ways to Improve the Scientific Publication Process
How should the scientific publication process be rethought to be more meritocratic?
Send us a link
How should the scientific publication process be rethought to be more meritocratic?
If we were to have to invent the scholarly publishing system again from scratch today, what would it look like?
While we need to alert researchers to the presence of predatory journals, we should mostly put our efforts into transforming the academic research environment and reward systems, raising standards and developing true collegiality both within and between institutions.
There are more academic publishers out there than ever before. In 2014 there was an estimated 28,100 active scientific journals, but while the large majority of these journals are highly respected, there has also been a sharp rise in the number of predatory journals.
For publishers, this moment of political upheaval has the potential to allow them to reboot their fraught relationships with libraries, universities, and scientists.
A leading website that monitored predatory open access journals has closed. This will make it harder to keep tabs on this corrosive force within science.
Poor monitoring in ‘second-tier’ institutions is also part of the problem, research indicates
Glasstree allows academics and their supporting institutions to actually profit from sales of their work.
An author and reviewer in conversation – the road to FAIRness in scientific publishing
Elsevier has announced the acquisition of Plum Analytics from EBSCO Information Services
A new open-access journal that focuses on the importance of public engagement to research has been published.
How to divest from a longstanding print legacy and truly embrace new digital technologies for the dissemination of research output.
Academia.edu, ResearchGate and private publishers all have something in common.
When a new grad student indicates an interest in an academic career, I ask, “So you want to be a Hollywood producer?”
Do journals do a good job of finding appropriate peers to review papers? Are editors always in the best place to decide the fate of a paper based on a severely limited sampling of peer reports?
Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan's $45 billion philanthropy organization is making its first acquisition in order to make it easier for scientists to search, read and tie together more than 26 million science research papers.
How do you know where to publish your research? Can you be sure the publisher you submit to is reputable? Read our guidance on what to look for.
Discussing the Future of Academic Publishing.
A geneticist's decision not to publish his finalized preprint in a journal gets support from scientists online.
Empowering researchers to publish Open Access by bringing transparency to Article Processing Charges.
A popular blog that lists “potential, possible, or probable predatory” publishers and journals has disappeared, but it is not clear why.
Accounting for equity and justice for patients, clinicians, academics, publishers, funders and academic institutions.
Jeffrey Beall’s blog was shut down for an unknown reasons.
The number of predatory publishers is skyrocketing – and they’re eager to pounce on unsuspecting scholars.
The potential advantages and challenges involved in a shift away from for-profit journals in favor of institutional open access publishing.
Some of the major mistakes early career researchers make when preparing and submitting a manuscript to a scientific journal.
Envisioning the scientific paper of the future.
Groups of authors citing each other is becoming an issue in scientific publishing. With a new approach, researchers discuss how to identify the problem.