How Does One "Open" Science?
3 case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how––and how best––to make things open.
3 case studies that highlight the challenges surrounding decisions about how––and how best––to make things open.
Fraudulent research and faked peer reviews have led to a humiliating setback for China's goal of becoming a global leader in scientific research.
How Anne Wojcicki led her company from the brink of failure to scientific pre-eminence.
Everybody talks about Blockchain these days, but why should we consider this technology when thinking about Open Scholarship?
Journal editors are more likely to reject papers when they experience trouble recruiting reviewers, reports a new study.
A "completely confusing statement" in a gazette notification has scientists wondering which of their papers will and won't be considered towards their promotions in the future.
DFG approved the funding of 17 high-performance electron microscopes with a total sum of €43 million. Funding for seven microscopes, amounting to €24 million, was awarded in the spring.
Philanthropy’s no replacement for crucial government science funding, but that message can get lost amid the high-profile gifts. Some science funders are now backing a push to protect federal funding.
Staid and conformist, science risks losing its creative spark. Does it need more mavericks, or are they part of the problem?
Brian C. Martinson imagines how rationing the number of publications a scientist could put out might improve the scientific literature.
Increased provision of information in accessible repositories appears to be a cost-effective way to advance science. Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial.
In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers are on arXiv.
An open document that tries to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Science movement currently stands.
A new study highlights the variety of productivity trajectories among faculty members in computer science.
80% of faculty exhibit a rich diversity of productivity patterns.
Accounting for audience gender ratio, men asked 1.8 questions for each question asked by a woman.
Tackling unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.
Global comparisons of previous social and economic upheavals suggest that what is to come depends on where you are now, argues Robert C. Allen.
If you’re a researcher writing software, this guide will show you how to make the work you share on GitHub citable.
A European Commission working group recommends Horizon 2020 evaluation process to account for gender issues.
Artificial-intelligence program AlphaGo Zero trained in just days, without any human input.
SpringerNature, the publisher of science magazines Nature and Scientific American, is preparing a 2018 stock market listing valuing the company at up to 4 billion euros.
Imagine a connected online web of scientific knowledge… tightly integrated with a scientific social web that directs scientists’ attention where it is most valuable, releasing enormous collaborative potential.