Who Should Speak for Academics over the Future of Publishing?
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe
Learned societies used to be seen as the guardians of academic prestige. They should act on that moral authority and reclaim their oversight of peer review, says Aileen Fyfe
Report urges academy to ‘embrace’ opportunities for wider research dissemination
The evolution to a high-profit industry was never planned. Academics need to make the case for lower-cost journals.
Cornerstone of modern science immortalized in concrete.
May 28-31, 2017, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Artificial intelligence is outperforming the human sort in a growing range of fields – but how do we make sure it behaves morally?
If you took Psychology 101 in college, you probably had to enroll in an experiment to fulfill a course requirement or to get extra credit.
Good looking, sociable people don’t make good scientists, according to popular stereotypes.
A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research.
Efforts to promote and enforce shared research have made progress in China, but there is much room for improvement.
In recent years, observers have noticed that articles for which an APC has been paid are not always made freely available. How pervasive is this problem?
The President's proposed budget guts scientific research and protection, because it either doesn't know what science is for, or doesn't care.
We find Nature Research's critical attitude towards journal impact factors, embodied in its signing of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA; Nature 544, 394; 2017), to be inconsistent with the aims of its Nature Index.
Libraries can survive these times of technological upheaval, but they’re going to have to change–and fast.
Containerization technology takes the hassle out of setting up software and can boost the reproducibility of data-driven research.
A few years back, scientists at the biotechnology company Amgen set out to replicate 53 landmark studies that argued for new approaches to treat cancers using both existing and new molecules. They were able to replicate the findings of the original research only 11 percent of the time.
Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?
Papers with female first authors receive 10% fewer citations than comparable work published by men, according to a new study
The time that you’re absolutely sick of saying it is about the time that your target audience has heard it for the first time.
Partly in response to the so-called 'reproducibility crisis' in science, researchers are embracing a set of practices that aim to make the whole endeavor more transparent, more reliable – and better.
Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.
This feature enables users to update the record’s files after they have been made public and researchers to easily cite either specific versions of a record or to cite, via a top-level DOI, all the versions of a record.
Nature will publish more details on experiments described in life-sciences papers.
Confidential feedback from many interacting reviewers can help editors make better, quicker decisions.
Thousands of open access papers have mistakenly asked readers to pay access fees, but publishers are correcting the errors.
Race-blind reviews very difficult and may not help, researchers say