How to Avoid the Stigma of a Retracted Paper? Don't Call It a Retraction
Avoiding the r-word would make it easier for researchers to correct the literature after an honest mistake.
Avoiding the r-word would make it easier for researchers to correct the literature after an honest mistake.
With algorithms in hand, scientists are looking to make elections in the United States more representative.
An international league of scientists is kicking off the decades-long process of developing the successor to the Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator.
What can we do to promote the productive use of preprints in biology?
Open-access mandates have the potential to significantly harm the publishing industry, writes the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property.
How academic publishing may change in the years to come.
Approach allows reviewers to focus on the stuff they know best, speeds up process.
Analysis backs controversial proposal to cap grant funding for bigger labs.
Computational scientists develop a system for spotting data overdue for public release, and end up getting hundreds of open-access datasets corrected.
Government offers 4-year grants worth up to €1.5million
Why do we need middlemen in academia in the era of electronic publishing?
In May 2017, we sat down with ECS journal editors Robert Savinell and Dennis Hess at the 231st ECS Meeting.
What results-free review might mean for authors, reviewers, editors and readers.
The challenges facing researchers in Japan and some of the structural weaknesses holding science back.
Preprints acceptable for citation in research grant and fellowship applications.
Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee the quality of published research remains difficult to verify.
Or why we should choose what to fund at random.
The right approach and a little extra effort will help improve your scientific literacy.
Plagiarism. Cheating. Lying. Should these scientists get a second chance?