Wellcome Open Research Author Survey Results
Author survey shows that publication speed and the ability to share a variety of research outputs are the primary reasons why authors publish on the Wellcome Open Research publishing platform.
Author survey shows that publication speed and the ability to share a variety of research outputs are the primary reasons why authors publish on the Wellcome Open Research publishing platform.
A $2 million crowdfunding campaign will finance an ambitious series of studies—designed under the watchful eye of the FDA—into psychedelics as treatment.
Starting this year, I will stop traveling to any speaking engagements on open science (or, more generally, infrastructure reform), as long as these events do not entail a clear goal for action.
Empowering the Next Generation to Advance Open Access, Open Education and Open Data.
Rise in copyright breaches prompts industry to discuss ways to allow ‘fair sharing’ of articles.
A call to simplify an overly complicated process
With exponential increases that reached 402% over a 20-year span, the spiralling cost of these large bundles rapidly put pressure on available budgets for books and journals from smaller learned societies.
Analysis of scholarly publishing’s ‘Napster’ shows that academics are not prepared to wait to access research. 35 per cent of articles downloaded from Sci-Hub were less than two years old when they were accessed.
What policymakers want from scientists, and what were the implications for synthesising evidence in ways that meet policy needs?
Although automated publishing would allow researchers to share their findings faster, while also removing human bias, there are obvious ethical dilemmas related to this dehumanisation of the process.
The STM Association Future Labs Committee explores the technology trends that will impact scholarly publishing by 2021.
Technologist argues that artificial intelligence could make publishing decisions in milliseconds.
Re-structuring presentation programmes could make meetings more accessible.
Researchers and manufacturers face possible jail time — or execution — for fraudulent submissions to nation's drug agency.
We suggest a centralized facility for submitting to journals—one that would benefit scientists and not only publishers.
Without data on how artificial intelligence is affecting jobs, policymakers will fly blind into the next industrial revolution, warn Tom Mitchell and Erik Brynjolfsson.
Add another high-profile departure to the list of people leaving Verily, the Google-spawned health science company: Thomas Insel, a neuroscientist and former head of the National Institutes of Mental Health who was leading Verily’s mental health initiatives.
The case of Colombian scientist Diego Gomez — on trial for copyright violation for sharing a research paper — is likely to reach a head later this month.
We describe the mathematical foundations and structure of TrueReview, an open-source tool we propose to build in support of post-publication review.
New technologies could deliver the benefits of nature without the hassle of life
An intellectual free-for-all doesn’t lead to the common ground on which research can build.
China has a lucrative market for fake research reagents. Some scientists are fighting back.
Presenting science as a battle for truth against ignorance is an unhelpful exaggeration.
ResearchGate and similar services represent a “gamification” of research, drawing on features usually associated with online games, like rewards, rankings and levels.
A brief summary of the main citation indicators used today.
Which platforms exist? Does it work? And what is funded?
Choices researchers can make to stop exploiting themselves and discriminating against others.