Top 16 Research Tools of 2016
A roundup of the top trending online tools of 2016 that were most appreciated and used by the LabWorm community.
A roundup of the top trending online tools of 2016 that were most appreciated and used by the LabWorm community.
How the scientist who founded the science of mistakes ended up mistaken.
Despite the typical stigma of retracting a scientific paper, Nathan Georgette is doing just fine — serving as a model to those many decades his senior.
Libraries pursue alternative delivery routes after licence negotiations break down.
So why make your work available as preprints? There are perceived positives and negatives to disclosing scientific work in the form of a preprint, explored here in the form of 10 Simple Rules.
The Royal Society Publishing Photography Competition celebrates the power of photography to communicate science.
Postdocs nationwide were set to have an increased minimum salary or become eligible for overtime pay until a court injunction halted new Department of Labor regulations.
Gingrich, the former House speaker and adviser to the president-elect, said "this is going to be a very science- and technology-oriented administration."
Universal Green OA Is the Most Efficient and Fairest of Science Publishing Strategies.
There’s no shortage of misinformation in the world — particularly around health and science topics.
The astrophysicist's groundbreaking research on spiral galaxies provided evidence of invisible dark matter. She was a pioneer in an era when women were excluded from many astronomy programs.
Analysis casts doubt on fears that ‘publish or perish’ culture undermines quality.
These scientists made important contributions to physics, biology, astronomy and more
Eight ways labs benefit from the popular workplace messaging tool.
Mr. Beall’s website, which identifies “predatory open access scholarly publishers” that masquerade as scholarly journals, has grown to 923 publishers from 18 in 2011.
Fake news and "post-truth," which may have played a role in the 2016 elections, are also problems in science publishing and science journalism.
How administrative procedure and law failed a scientist accused of research misconduct.
As the year ends, the Science desk of The New York Times asked its reporters to look back at the news they reported on that was the most memorable. These are their selections, with a focus on archaeology, biology, physics and space.
As I was thinking about casting my vote for the Open Science Prize, I realized that I would in fact need a rubric for choosing. I was concerned that the public vote would tend towards popularity, familiarity, or bling, rather than the quality of the open science. But what does it mean to be “quality open science?” What should be the most important criteria?
Having examined the organisation of Europe’s academic labour markets, Alexandre Afonso outlines the main differences between countries across the continent. There is greatest variance in two …
Young scientists angry at budget cuts say they have been denied permanent jobs.
Gary McDowell, Misty Heggeness and colleagues present census data showing how the biomedical workforce is fundamentally different to those of past generations – academia should study the trends, and adapt.