Scientists Loved and Loathedby an Agrochemical Giant
With corporate funding of research, “there’s no scientist who comes out of this unscathed.”
With corporate funding of research, “there’s no scientist who comes out of this unscathed.”
2016 will go down as a year that taught us to question our assumptions. The election of Donald Trump, an outcome
Time devoted to research is increasingly precious to us in academia. We chastise ourselves for not being able to keep up with the huge volumes of current literature. If only there was some way that all the latest literature on a particular topic could be packaged together for us, and delivered right to our inbox without us even having to lift a finger! Now, what would we call such an improbable utopia – ah yes, peer review.
The potential for open scholarship to improve university research and education, as well asincrease the impact universities can have beyond their own walls.
A committment by a young researcher to practice open and good science, and more generally to free culture.
Fake news has been in the news a lot lately. Fake news proliferated wildly during the 2016 U.S. election, much of it completely fabricated, usually with an extreme partisan bias. Fake news is corrosive. It mis-informs the public, divides people against one another, leads to bad policy decisions, and can even induce people to take action against imaginary threats.
Traditionally, at the beginning of the new year we celebrated what is known as Public Domain Day: on the first of January of any given year the works of authors who have been dead for more than 70 years enter the public domain. As this is a decisive year for copyright reform in the European Union, it seems much more important to highlight the dangers for the public domain that we are facing in the context of the copyright reform process.
It’s often argued that studying the liberal arts will enrich the life of the mind. For STEM majors, it can also give them a practical advantage in their careers.
The technique could be faster and more versatile than developing GMO crops from scratch.
A series of measures improving research efficiency and robustness of scientific findings by directly targeting specific threats to reproducible science.
After a decade of progress, Argentina’s scientists are battling a government bent on twisting public conceptions of their role.
Paris's École 42 is reinventing education for the future
Among the wider scientific community, there is a widespread dissatisfaction with the current level of transparency and reproducibility in published research and, as part of our response to this, we signed up to the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines (https://cos.io/top/).The objective of the TOP guidelines is to encourage transparency, openness and reproducibility in science. By developing shared standards for openness across journals, it is hoped to change the current incentive structures to drive researchers' behaviour towards more openness.
While postdocs are necessary for entry into tenure-track jobs, they do not enhance salaries in other job sectors over time.
A survey of 2,955 readers of 40 randomly selected science blogs.
Nobel prizewinning astrophysicist reflects on the perceptions and realities of how big breakthroughs are made.
Research can produce good evidence to inform local, national and international policy that, in turn, has the potential to transform lives for the better. But influencing policy is neither easy nor automatic – you need to want to do it. To be successful, you need to be open to different ways of working. Here are 10 things you need to know.
In a sweeping manifesto, researchers from the U.S. and Europe have proposed some fixes for vetting published science. It might help science journalism, too.
How can firms benefit most under economic downturns?
Shouldn't all research be, first and foremost, accessible? Accessibility underpins equality.
The 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 6 - 8 June, 2017, Limassol, Cyprus.
Publications such as Nature and Science have policies that clash with the global health charity's open-access mandate.