Want a favorable peer review? Buy one
Want a favorable peer review? Buy one
Peer review hacking, where a fake identity is used to write a favorable review, is of growing concern to journal editors.
Peer review hacking, where a fake identity is used to write a favorable review, is of growing concern to journal editors.
Vice President Joe Biden has met with thousands of stakeholders across all sectors, seeking suggestions for how to remove the barriers that are currently blocking progress in science, research, and development.
Op-ed: Big US companies could use patent licensing to throttle EU startups.
The new David Rumsey Map Center, which opened last week at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, showcases what was once one of the world’s great private map collections—more than 150,000 maps, globes, and cartographic artifacts.
Commission announces new Flagship plan with little fanfare
You all know about publication bias, don't you? Sure you do. It's the tendency to publish research that has bold, affirmative results and ignore research that concludes there's nothing going on.
Dodgy results are fuelling flawed policy decisions and undermining medical advances. They could even make us lose faith in science. New Scientist investigates
An outspoken biologist uses social media as a megaphone as he calls out his colleagues for hyping their research findings and ignoring women scientists.
Whilst Brexit looms more ominously in the background, the next generation of data publishing is moving towards an ever-more collaborative and open place in which researchers can easily choose to make discoveries and data sets available across borders and cultures.
The replicability of psychological research is surprisingly low. Why? In this blog post I present new evidence showing that questionable research practices contributed to failures to replicate psyc…
There is increasing support in the scholarly communications community for “flipping” the standard journal publishing model from subscription-based to “gold” open access...
Who reads science blogs, and why? This broad question started this Experiment.com project, and now the results are in.
Supporting Europe's innovators through open innovation - 2014-2019
Turning scientific evidence into policy exposes a gulf between how scientists think and how policymakers work. Here’s what scientists need to know
A 40-year longitudinal cross-validation of citations, downloads, and peer review in astrophysics
Empowering the Next Generation to Advance Open Access, Open Education and Open Data.
Female scientists face everyday, often-unintentional microaggression in the workplace, and it won't stop unless we talk about it, says Tricia Serio.
David Kent breaks down an eLife article that suggests peer review scores cannot distinguish very good grants from excellent grants. In fact, at a certain point in the process, it is pretty much a random lottery.
Climate scientists skeptical of plans for new center
A new open science business model charges those who want to keep information private to subsidise those who share it
In this interview with EuroScientist, Lawrence Rajendran explains why he created Matters, to change the way we communicate science.
For every characteristic of uberisation, there is a parallel in the world of research. This raises the question of whether research was "uberised" before Uber even existed?
In response to rising concerns about irreproducible science and the lack of somewhere to openly discuss these issues, we recently launched the Preclinical Reproducibility and Robustness Channel.