Duplicated images plague research papers
A new analysis finds that 3.8 percent of scientific studies have images duplicated from another paper.
A new analysis finds that 3.8 percent of scientific studies have images duplicated from another paper.
An analysis reveals that the text contents of the scientific papers generally change very little from their pre-print to final published versions.
Science magazine just published a great piece on the utility of Sci-Hub. Unfortunately, its defense of its own business model is flawed.
Shannon had a weakness for juggling and unicycles, but his fingerprints are on every electronic device we own.
HHMI, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation announce the International Research Scholars Program which aims to support up to 50 outstanding early career scientists worldwide.
Researchers are increasingly relying on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk and its crowdsourced labor.
Psychologist Tania Lombrozo and a colleague, both moms, built an academic conference keeping in mind parents who are trying to juggle the competing demands of caregiving and professional advancement.
We can all recognise the ambitious researcher at the conference who is anxious to advertise their own work while affecting interest in the keynote speaker’s presentation. It resonates with my current work on academic self-promotion via university profile pages. And I start to wonder, is a new academic habitus is beginning to emerge?
Retractions are on the rise. But reams of flawed research papers persist in the scientific literature. Is it time to change the way papers are published?
After hundreds of manipulated images were detected across 40 scientific journals, the real work will be to correct the scientific record.
Not a scientist? As David Lang shows, you can still play a meaningful role in solving science’s hardest problems.
A Princeton professor’s frankness hides the grim reality about work for many young people
As long men can score points for producing mountains of output, women will never get a fair shot at academic promotion
Breaking down lengthy, narrative-driven biomedical articles into brief reports on singular observations or experiments could increase reproducibility and accessibility in the literature.
Canadian scientists are now allowed to speak out about their work — and the government policy that had restricted communications.
The problem of bias in published research must be tackled in a consistent and comprehensive fashion, says Adam G. Dunn.
Following their February breakthrough, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, Ronald Drever and nearly 1,000 LIGO scientists will share the Silicon Valley-backed prize.
The scientific community must do a better job confronting the issues facing women in science, our author writes
Launch of Research Integrity and Peer Review, a new open-access journal that will provide a home to research on ethics, reporting, and evaluation of research.
However, director of the Oxford Martin School says 'disciplinary silos' were one factor contributing to 2008 financial crisis
Sci-Hub is facing millions of dollars in damages in a lawsuit filed by Elsevier, one of the largest academic publishers. As a result of the legal battle the site just lost one of its latest domain names. However, the site has no intentions of backing down, and will continue its fight to keep access to scientific knowledge free and open.
The opinions of others are key to creating or damaging an institution's reputation
The symposium “Personalized Health in the Digitial Age” brings together some of the world's thought leaders in the ongoing revolution in personalized and digital health.