How many replication studies are enough?
Researchers on social media ask at what point replication efforts go from useful to wasteful.
Researchers on social media ask at what point replication efforts go from useful to wasteful.
Our reverence for science has led to a culture of "new findings" and sensationalistic headlines.
As wearable devices in the workplace spread, so do the legal concerns. Companies can now use the devices to monitor their employees’ health and track their locations. How should such technology be used to avoid legal problems?
The release of millions of journal papers online reflects impatience with an outdated publishing model, says John Willinsky
Under-representation of women in science greater in Switzerland than in Europe.
The Royal Society’s new campaign highlights the importance of life outside the laboratory
When a commercial publisher re-uses images from your blog without permission or attribution.
A proposal for a more peer review based funding of Swedish research prepared by the Swedish Research Council has been rejected by a majority of Swedish universities.
Training a computer to play Go is an impressive achievement, but AlphaGo may be a long way from being a useful product.
Policymakers are moving forward with plans to turn our genetic information into potentially lucrative data. Drawing on recent Freedom of Information disclosures, Edward Hockings and Lewis Coyne ask whether we can trust our institutions with our genomes.
The solution to a 300-year-old mystery has landed Oxford University Professor Sir Andrew Wiles the top international prize for mathematics.
The era of predictable improvement in computer hardware is ending. What comes next?
It could be possible to publish quickly online without alienating oneself from the traditional journal system.
Combining commercial and academic incentives and resources can improve science, argues Aled Edwards.
Alok Jha examines the practices and cultures that can undermine the integrity of science.
A new study shows that p-values have become more popular — and more meaningless — over time.
Colette Bourlier, who awarded a high distinction for her thesis on immigrant workers, said it took so long because she ‘took breaks’.
To engage the public in your work, whilst also solving that all-important research funding problem?
Recently, some have begun to explore the utilization of the crowd for various purposes in medical research, including fundraising as well as crowdsourcing for intellectual analyses and insights.
Peter Maloca from University of Basel is one of the winners of the Wellcome Image Awards 2016.
A review of approaches and experiences on how to convert subscription-based scholarly journals to open access.
In the race to apply for research funding, writing statements about future impact can feel like a charade.
There are three vectors of failure that can be addressed by better technology: time, cost, and the quality of the output itself.
Scientists are designing cells that can manufacture drugs, food and materials and even act as diagnostic biosensors.
John Ioannidis is perhaps best known for a 2005 paper “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” One of the most highly cited researchers in the world, Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford, has built a career in the field of meta-research.
It is now easier to obtain a clear and transparent overview of the thousands of scientific research projects funded by the SNSF. Its P3 database has been redesigned to display information interactively.
Scientists and journalists share similar skills and challenges in digital storytelling, especially when it comes to researching an unfamiliar field. Current tools for searching information from the academic world in particular can be difficult and time-consuming. PubMed and Google Scholar, for example, present searches linearly—a long list of things to sift through. And if you [...]