Einstein was boring before he was brilliant
Innovation almost always requires long periods of quite traditional training.
Innovation almost always requires long periods of quite traditional training.
For-profit company Elsevier explains Open Science.
The European Commission has abandoned consideration of 'Science 2.0', finding it too ambitious.
[5]Frontiers dismisses 31 of its editors, based on escalated opposition to the publisher’s unique publication model.
[8]Editas, a company started by several gene-editing pioneers, gets new funding to develop treatments for blood cancers, eye diseases, and sickle-cell anemia.
Positive results are exciting, but the interest in positive results is skewing what we know about science.
"Making non-attachment a central part of science education would beat the hell out of ethics classes and regulations about the use of Photoshop in preparing figures."
Peer review may not spot fraud – so universities need to be vigilant in tackling any wrongdoing among their staff.
Today’s patent regime operates in the name of progress. Instead, it sets innovation back. Time to fix it.
The involvement of online discussion sites in the identification of errors, anomalies and worse in the published literature continues to demonstrate the usefulness of post-publication review. It also highlights the ambiguous power of anonymity.
[21]New analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration across the UK research landscape highlights important questions about how we organise, fund and assess research.
Science hackathons can help academics, particularly those in the early stage of their careers, to build collaborations and write research proposals.
This paper asks the question: do people with different levels of research productivity and identification as a researcher think of research differently?
Alert your followers on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and other social networking sites by announcing your published work along with a link to your article. To encourage sharing - use hashtags relevant to your subject and tag co-authors or department colleagues who may also want to share your paper. Looking for more ideas?
Modern science is becoming larger-scale and more collaborative.
An increasing number of universities fuse. This is shown by a recent report of the European University Association. [in GERMAN]
US judges dismiss injunctions against journals.
Academics are challenging the control of a select group of publishing houses over scientific journals.
Open science will be one of the priorities of the Dutch presidency of the European Union in 2016.
Springer is pulling another 64 articles from 10 journals after finding evidence of faked peer reviews, bringing the total number of retractions from the phenomenon north of 230.
A Brexit would put the UK’s academic success at risk as European research stars go elsewhere.
"If we’re going to rely on science as a means for reaching the truth — and it’s still the best tool we have — it’s important that we understand and respect just how difficult it is to get a rigorous result."
What recent research says about fraud, errors, and other dismaying academic problems.
From the oceans to the soil, technology is changing the part that amateurs can play in research. But this greater involvement raises concerns that must be addressed.
Institutions and funders should be alert to unfeasibly prolific authors when measuring and creating incentives for researcher productivity.
Paper showing that increasing research investments, resulting in an increasing knowledge base, have not yielded comparative gains in certain health outcomes over the last five decades. [Closed Access]
Interdisciplinarity is often framed as an unquestioned good within and beyond the academy, one to be encouraged by funders and research institutions alike. And yet there is little research on how interdisciplinary projects actually work—and do not work—in practice.
Poor countries often complain that their best minds are draining away—and for the most part they are right. The poorer the country, the larger the proportion of inventors who push off.
At Chaos Communication Camp 2015, a researcher explained how to jump paywalls, obtain academic research and freely share that research without getting arrested.