Replication Studies
Replication Studies
Researchers with a PhD who are employed by a Dutch research institution can request funding for the replication of 'cornerstone research'.
Researchers with a PhD who are employed by a Dutch research institution can request funding for the replication of 'cornerstone research'.
Looking at some of the issues around the reuse of scientific data and open a conversation about how to deal with them.
In April, we announced we were pausing our public engagement funding to thoroughly review and explore the best ways for us to support public engagement activities in future. Now, we’re pleased – and more than a little excited – to share the outcome of this work.
Agency will make researchers outside United States seek grants of their own rather than “subawards” from U.S. scientists.
When a scientific paper is retracted, it can produce long-term aftershocks.
The world's richest man promises more than he has delivered. His social network purchase is likely to go the same way
A new movement calls for tech investors to back more start-ups led by women and people from ethnic minorities.
A new ethics framework urges researchers to promote greater equity in global collaborations.
For Ph.D. candidates and postdocs, the relationship with your supervisor can make or break a career. The onus for a positive and nurturing relationship should fall largely on the senior member.
Cap at current spending levels could spell 'end of science in Brazil', researchers say.
Elsevier's role in the EU's Open Science Monitor is examined more closely.
When knowledge is uncertain, experts should avoid pressures to simplify their advice. Render decision-makers accountable for decisions, says Andy Stirling.
Researchers naturally want their work to make a difference, but the sad fact is that it often has little influence beyond academia
More than 1 million studies are now downloaded from the site every month, mostly in neuroscience, bioinformatics and genomics.
Researchers found 127 systematic reviews and clinical guidelines that cited already retracted papers.
Fraudulent research and faked peer reviews have led to a humiliating setback for China's goal of becoming a global leader in scientific research.
Review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) processes significantly affect how faculty direct their own career and scholarly progression. Although RPT practices vary between and within institutions, and affect various disciplines, ranks, institution types, genders, and ethnicity in different ways, some consistent themes emerge when investigating what faculty would like to change about RPT. For instance, over the last few decades, RPT processes have generally increased the value placed on research, at the expense of teaching and service, which often results in an incongruity between how faculty actually spend their time vs. what is considered in their evaluation. Another issue relates to publication practices: most agree RPT requirements should encourage peer-reviewed works of high quality, but in practice, the value of publications is often assessed using shortcuts such as the prestige of the publication venue, rather than on the quality and rigor of peer review of each individual item.
The QuantERA programme is designed to accelerate the development of quantum technologies (QT) in Europe, amid global competition. A member of the QuantERA Strategic Advisory Board - a scientific body with a broad range of perspectives in the QT field - has just been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. Prof. Alain Aspect, along with Prof. John. F. Cluster and Prof. Anton Zelilinger received the prize "for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science".
The first articles have gone live on Wellcome Open Research; 15 of them in total, with more submissions in the pipeline.
As action on climate change becomes ever more urgent, it requires ever greater public action. The next stage of the transition to net-zero emissions demands changes to the vehicles we drive, the way we heat our homes and our choices as consumers.
Researchers project changes ahead for federal science if Republicans take control of either chamber of Congress.
In the aftermath of the election results, a group of women in the sciences has banded together to speak out against anti-intellectualism, inequality, sexism and discrimination.
New study suggests a major return on investment for institutions that help their researchers write better grants.
Further to my other post earlier this week, I have added the additional points to my response letter to the Plan S implementation guidelines. These centre around monographs (9), REF involvement in Plan S (10), infrastructural support (11), the "time of publication" (12), clarification of the term "quality" (13), compliance of existing software with repository requirements (14), publisher deposition (15), and the ability to pursue defamation suits for wrongful attribution and reputational damage with the waiver of moral rights under CC BY 4.0 (16). If number 16 could be resolved, the open licensing landscape would be much clearer. The full letter is now available.