Publish or perish? Metrics and research diversity
If we want to embed equality and diversity in research culture, any future use of metrics to assess research must not adversely affect specific groups or researchers.
Send us a link
Towards an open science publishing platform
The traditional way of publishing new findings in journals is becoming increasingly outdated and no longer serves the needs of much of science.
Assessment of H2020 programme
An assessment of the first two years of Horizon 2020 programme, taking into account
iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers
iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers
An intelligent machine learning framework for scientific evaluation of researchers may help decision makers to better allocate the available funding to the distinguished scientists through providing fair comparative results, regardless of the career age of the researchers.
Independent advice
Independent advice from Professor Adam Tickell on open access to research publications.
Individual bibliometric assessment at University of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles
Individual bibliometric assessment at University of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles
This paper shows how bibliometric assessment can be implemented at individual level.
Rapid Science
To promote and reward collaboration we’re developing a “C-score” that measures the quality and quantity of collaborators’ contributions to group efforts.,
THE University Workplace Survey 2016
Times Higher Education's poll shows that the bulk of staff find their work rewarding but there is a deep gulf between academics and professional and support staff.
The Research Pirates of the Dark Web
After getting shut down late last year, a website that allows free access to paywalled academic papers has sprung back up in a shadowy corner of the Internet.
Does it take too long to publish research?
Scientists are becoming increasingly frustrated by the time it takes to publish a paper.
ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process
High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators.
A plea for open science on Zika
20 funding organizations and public funding agencies from 11 countries promise that they will require grantees to have plans in place for sharing their results and data ASAP.
Obama makes risky bid to increase science spending
Many research advocates worry that the proposal could backfire in the face of political opposition.
Top Nobel Prize administrator resigns in wake of Macchiarini scandal
The widening scandal surrounding surgeon Paolo Macchiarini and his employment at the Karolinska Insitute in Stockholm has prompted Urban Lendahl, secretary general of the Nobel Assembly, to resign.
Getting credit for peer review
It’s rare for scientists to get much systematic or public recognition for their reviewing efforts
The collaboration curse
The fashion for making employees collaborate has gone too far.
Let's just try that again
Reproducibility should be at science’s heart. It isn’t. But that may soon change.
A tragedy of errors
Mistakes in peer-reviewed papers are easy to find but hard to fix.
Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary research
A method that could be used by funding agencies, universities and scientific policy decision makers for hiring and funding purposes, and to complement existing methods to rank universities and countries.
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
This study shows that the long-run patterns of international scientific collaboration are generating a convergence between applied and basic fields. This convergence of collaboration patterns across research fields might be one of contributing factors that supports the evolution of scientific disciplines.
Qauality and transparency of the peer-review process
The transparency of the peer-review process is an indicator of peer-review quality.
Someone is showing what it'd be like if male scientists were written about like women
"A devout husband and father, Darwin balanced his family duties with the study of the specimens he brought from his travels."
Why is it so damn hard to get a paper retracted?
Despite the real-time scrutiny of internet publication, getting a paper retracted or corrected turns out to be nearly impossible.
The Unknown, Poorly Paid Labor Force Powering Academic Research
Researchers are increasingly relying on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk and its crowdsourced labor.
Excellence program gets good grades
Germany should award millions of euros in extra funding to its 10 top-performing universities, an international commission recommends.
Academics across Europe join 'Brexit' debate
If the United Kingdom leaves the EU, researchers throughout the bloc will feel the effects.
Research quality declines with scientists' age, study finds
Authors argue this means universities should spend less on senior academics and give promising younger scholars more of a chance
High rejection rates by journals 'pointless'
Analysis suggests higher selectivity fails to increase journals' impact factors
Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.
Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.
A series of studies across countries and disciplines in higher education confirm that student evaluations of teaching (SET) are significantly correlated with instructor gender, with students regularly rating female instructors lower than male peers.
×