NIH to experiment with high-risk grants
NIH considers supporting more individual researchers rather than projects.
Send us a link
NIH considers supporting more individual researchers rather than projects.
Researchers uncovered evidence of women scientists working in the field of infectious diseases being disadvantaged in crucial funding allocations for more than a decade in the UK.
Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to Randy W. Schekman who has declared a boycott on the publications.
Researchers have been receiving notices from Academia.edu with takedown requests from Elsevier.
A concentration of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies explains the Swiss position atop the rankings, according to USISTF director Ann Liebschutz.
The journal Food and Chemical Toxicology has just retracted a controversial article published in September 2012 claiming a link between genetically modified maize and cancer.
Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) richtet neun weitere Sonderforschungsbereiche (SFB) ein.
Controversial model points to benefits of more opinionated reviews.
Peer review, many boffins argue, channelling Churchill, is the worst way to ensure quality of research, except all the others. The system, which relies on papers being vetted by anonymous experts prior to publication, has underpinned scientific literature for decades.
In the global marketplace of higher education, the humanities are increasingly threatened by decreased funding and political attacks.
Wie sich die UBS mit ihrer Spende von 100 Millionen Franken die Universität Zürich hörig machte.
Scientists desperate to have an "impact" in their field are cherry-picking and misrepresenting their results. It's the natural result of a desperate scramble to publish. Science, according to a recent Nature article, is like Battleship. You fire shots into the dark and mostly miss your target.
When scientists moan about how little politicians know about science, I usually get annoyed. Such grouching is almost always counterproductive and more often than not betrays how little scientists know about the UK's governance structures, processes, culture and history.
How easy is it to reproduce the results found in a typical computational biology paper? Either through experience or intuition the reader will already know that the answer is with difficulty or not at all.
An individual tool to help you explore career possibilities and set goals to follow the career path that fits you best.
The Bloomberg administration and venture capitalists create a $100 million program for small firms.
When the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is humming along, the data come in a deluge.
Scientific articles written by Dutch researchers must be accessible for everyone to read free of charge from 2016.
Peers criticise 'ad hoc' spending announcements on infrastructure
The FDA is concerned about the public health consequences of inaccurate results from Google's personal genome service device.
Researchers can still operate by the rules and norms of science, but under Horizon 2020 they have - with the exception of the ERC - no autonomy to decide what science they do.
Research from the University of Copenhagen, which has just been published in the journal Philosophy and Technology, shows how the mechanisms that set off the financial crisis might be replicating in the field of science.
Academics concerned universities are excluding interdisciplinary research from the Research Excellence Framework exercise.
Reporting suspicions of scientific fraud is rarely easy, but some paths are more effective than others.
Who are the outstanding mentors of young researchers? Since 2005, Nature has awarded an annual prize for scientific mentoring, rotating through a variety of countries.
The do-it-yourself-biology movement has an image problem. More commonly called DIYbio, it tends to conjure up pictures of T-shirt-clad misfits marshalling limited scientific skill in their basements as they try to make cool-but-fringe things such as glow-in-the-dark plants.
Much like the trade and traits of bubbles in financial markets, similar bubbles appear on the science market.
The journal impact factor is an annually calculated number for each scientific journal, based on the average number of times its articles published in the two preceding years have been cited.
Essay on the problems relating to reliance on subject-specific journals and peer review.