Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

Women scientists less likely to receive funding

Women scientists less likely to receive funding

Researchers uncovered evidence of women scientists working in the field of infectious diseases being disadvantaged in crucial funding allocations for more than a decade in the UK.

Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals

Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals

Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to Randy W. Schekman who has declared a boycott on the publications.

GM maize, health and the Séralini affair

GM maize, health and the Séralini affair

The journal Food and Chemical Toxicology has just retracted a controversial article published in September 2012 claiming a link between genetically modified maize and cancer.

DFG richtet neun weitere Sonderforschungsbereiche ein

DFG richtet neun weitere Sonderforschungsbereiche ein

Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) richtet neun weitere Sonderforschungsbereiche (SFB) ein.

How to fix peer review

How to fix peer review

Peer review, many boffins argue, channelling Churchill, is the worst way to ensure quality of research, except all the others. The system, which relies on papers being vetted by anonymous experts prior to publication, has underpinned scientific literature for decades.

Scientific journals should stop trying to be exciting - and focus on being right

Scientific journals should stop trying to be exciting - and focus on being right

Scientists desperate to have an "impact" in their field are cherry-picking and misrepresenting their results. It's the natural result of a desperate scramble to publish. Science, according to a recent Nature article, is like Battleship. You fire shots into the dark and mostly miss your target.

Top 20 things scientists need to know about policy-making

Top 20 things scientists need to know about policy-making

When scientists moan about how little politicians know about science, I usually get annoyed. Such grouching is almost always counterproductive and more often than not betrays how little scientists know about the UK's governance structures, processes, culture and history.

Science magazine individual development career plan

Science magazine individual development career plan

An individual tool to help you explore career possibilities and set goals to follow the career path that fits you best.

Scientific articles must be free for everyone to read in the Netherlands

Scientific articles must be free for everyone to read in the Netherlands

Scientific articles written by Dutch researchers must be accessible for everyone to read free of charge from 2016.

FDA tells google-backed 23andMe to halt DNA test service

FDA tells google-backed 23andMe to halt DNA test service

The FDA is concerned about the public health consequences of inaccurate results from Google's personal genome service device.

Where does this leave the scientists?

Where does this leave the scientists?

Researchers can still operate by the rules and norms of science, but under Horizon 2020 they have - with the exception of the ERC - no autonomy to decide what science they do.

Research funding has become prone to bubble formation

Research funding has become prone to bubble formation

Research from the University of Copenhagen, which has just been published in the journal Philosophy and Technology, shows how the mechanisms that set off the financial crisis might be replicating in the field of science.

Enemy of the good

Enemy of the good

Who are the outstanding mentors of young researchers? Since 2005, Nature has awarded an annual prize for scientific mentoring, rotating through a variety of countries.

The DIY dilemma

The DIY dilemma

The do-it-yourself-biology movement has an image problem. More commonly called DIYbio, it tends to conjure up pictures of T-shirt-clad misfits marshalling limited scientific skill in their basements as they try to make cool-but-fringe things such as glow-in-the-dark plants.

Impact beyond the impact factor

Impact beyond the impact factor

The journal impact factor is an annually calculated number for each scientific journal, based on the average number of times its articles published in the two preceding years have been cited.

Journals, repositories, peer review, non-peer review, and the future of scholarly communication

Journals, repositories, peer review, non-peer review, and the future of scholarly communication

Essay on the problems relating to reliance on subject-specific journals and peer review.