Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

The advantage of simple paper abstracts

The advantage of simple paper abstracts

Paper showing that doubling the word frequency of an average abstract increases citations by 0.70% and that journals which publish papers whose abstracts are shorter and contain more frequently used words receive slightly more citations per paper.

The Research Pirates of the Dark Web

The Research Pirates of the Dark Web

After getting shut down late last year, a website that allows free access to paywalled academic papers has sprung back up in a shadowy corner of the Internet.

ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process

ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process

High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators.

A plea for open science on Zika

A plea for open science on Zika

20 funding organizations and public funding agencies from 11 countries promise that they will require grantees to have plans in place for sharing their results and data ASAP.

Obama makes risky bid to increase science spending

Obama makes risky bid to increase science spending

Many research advocates worry that the proposal could backfire in the face of political opposition.

Top Nobel Prize administrator resigns in wake of Macchiarini scandal

Top Nobel Prize administrator resigns in wake of Macchiarini scandal

The widening scandal surrounding surgeon Paolo Macchiarini and his employment at the Karolinska Insitute in Stockholm has prompted Urban Lendahl, secretary general of the Nobel Assembly, to resign.

Publish or perish? Metrics and research diversity

Publish or perish? Metrics and research diversity

If we want to embed equality and diversity in research culture, any future use of metrics to assess research must not adversely affect specific groups or researchers.

iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers

iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers

An intelligent machine learning framework for scientific evaluation of researchers may help decision makers to better allocate the available funding to the distinguished scientists through providing fair comparative results, regardless of the career age of the researchers.

Individual bibliometric assessment at University of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles

Individual bibliometric assessment at University of Vienna: from numbers to multidimensional profiles

This paper shows how bibliometric assessment can be implemented at individual level.

Someone is showing what it'd be like if male scientists were written about like women

Someone is showing what it'd be like if male scientists were written about like women

"A devout husband and father, Darwin balanced his family duties with the study of the specimens he brought from his travels."

Why is it so damn hard to get a paper retracted?

Why is it so damn hard to get a paper retracted?

Despite the real-time scrutiny of internet publication, getting a paper retracted or corrected turns out to be nearly impossible.

The Unknown, Poorly Paid Labor Force Powering Academic Research

The Unknown, Poorly Paid Labor Force Powering Academic Research

Researchers are increasingly relying on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk and its crowdsourced labor.

Academics across Europe join 'Brexit' debate

Academics across Europe join 'Brexit' debate

If the United Kingdom leaves the EU, researchers throughout the bloc will feel the effects.

If you fail to reproduce another scientist's results, this journal wants to know

If you fail to reproduce another scientist's results, this journal wants to know

The biotech company Amgen Inc. and prominent biochemist Bruce Alberts have created a new online journal that aims to lift the curtain on often hidden results in biomedicine: failed efforts to confirm other groups' published papers.

Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.

Student evaluations of teaching are not only unreliable, they are significantly biased against female instructors.

A series of studies across countries and disciplines in higher education confirm that student evaluations of teaching (SET) are significantly correlated with instructor gender, with students regularly rating female instructors lower than male peers.