Subscribe to our newsletter

Send us a link

NSF test finds eliminating deadlines halves number of grant proposals

NSF test finds eliminating deadlines halves number of grant proposals

NSF geosciences advisory committee reveales the preliminary results from a pilot program that got rid of grant proposal deadlines in favor of an anytime submission.

The complex role of gender in faculty hiring

The complex role of gender in faculty hiring

In computer science faculty hiring decisions, gender is indirectly considered through its correlation with measures like productivity, study finds

Revolutionizing research communication through a new academic publishing platform

Revolutionizing research communication through a new academic publishing platform

The way that researchers communicate their work has not changed significantly in the last few centuries; academic publishing still relies on journal articles an…

How can we keep science honest in a world of open data?

How can we keep science honest in a world of open data?

The advantages of making scientific data available for further analysis are clear, but it could also enable the trawling of data to find significant, or preferred, results.

Tech expert and cancer survivor to lead U.S. 1-million-person health study

Tech expert and cancer survivor to lead U.S. 1-million-person health study

A technology guru and cancer survivor has been tapped to head President Obama’s ambitious 1-million-person personalized medicine study.

Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding

Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding

Obtaining a more joined up picture of financial flows is vital as a means for researchers, ­institutions and others to understand and shape changes to the ­sociotechnical systems that underpin scholarly communication.

The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers

The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers

Ideally, in a reviewing process, it is generally easier for referees to make faster and more reliable decisions for high quality papers, which ideally and on average will later attract more citations. Therefore, it is possible that the editorial delay time—the time between dates of submission and acceptance or publication—is correlated to the number of received citations, as has been weakly confirmed by previous studies.

How one lab challenged a grant rejection and won €5 million

How one lab challenged a grant rejection and won €5 million

A British scientist successfully appealed against an unfavourable grant review — but the road to victory can be paved with challenges.