How grad students get paid affects where they work
Surprising results add to fierce debate over how NIH funds graduate students
Send us a link
Surprising results add to fierce debate over how NIH funds graduate students
NSF geosciences advisory committee reveales the preliminary results from a pilot program that got rid of grant proposal deadlines in favor of an anytime submission.
In computer science faculty hiring decisions, gender is indirectly considered through its correlation with measures like productivity, study finds
Scientific journal policies, physics' head start with arXiv, and differences in the culture of the two disciplines may all play a role.
Dutch push for a quantum leap in open access
The European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) gets poor grades from the European Union’s financial watchdog.
Dodgy results are fuelling flawed policy decisions and undermining medical advances. They could even make us lose faith in science. New Scientist investigates
The way that researchers communicate their work has not changed significantly in the last few centuries; academic publishing still relies on journal articles an…
As the White House prepares for its annual science fair, it's worth remembering that these events leave some children behind.
If Thomson Reuters can calculate Impact Factors and Eigenfactors, why can’t they deliver a simple median score?
The advantages of making scientific data available for further analysis are clear, but it could also enable the trawling of data to find significant, or preferred, results.
How can research funders ensure ‘unlucky’ applications are handled more appropriately?
A technology guru and cancer survivor has been tapped to head President Obama’s ambitious 1-million-person personalized medicine study.
Biases in grant proposal success rates, funding rates and award sizes affect the geographical distribution of funding for biomedical research
The interface between science and business is where innovation is brought to life, but do the two fields always get along?
Obtaining a more joined up picture of financial flows is vital as a means for researchers, institutions and others to understand and shape changes to the sociotechnical systems that underpin scholarly communication.
The rationale is simple: More anonymity means more scrutiny for published papers, and more scrutiny means more errors are caught.
A. Hope Jahren on women, research, and life in the lab.
Ideally, in a reviewing process, it is generally easier for referees to make faster and more reliable decisions for high quality papers, which ideally and on average will later attract more citations. Therefore, it is possible that the editorial delay time—the time between dates of submission and acceptance or publication—is correlated to the number of received citations, as has been weakly confirmed by previous studies.
A British scientist successfully appealed against an unfavourable grant review — but the road to victory can be paved with challenges.
Towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials