The Rogue Neuroscientist on a Mission to Hack Peer Review
The Rogue Neuroscientist on a Mission to Hack Peer Review
The Edward Snowden of peer review.
Send us a link
The Edward Snowden of peer review.
Editor asked to resign from journal for saying he’ll review only papers whose data he can see.
If you are a futurist or make predictions, send them to us, and the whole world will see them.
Financing massive-scale copyright infringement.
How to take into account differences in standards, confidence and bias in assessment panels.
In 2016, Joel Pitt and Prof. Helene Hill published an intriguing paper with us looking at the prevalence of scientific fraud in preclinical research...
Why journal publishing should be upended from the current model, in which institutions pay publishers for access to content, to one in which the academic community pays for services to publish content and retains ownership of research.
As LinkedIn continues to reign as the world’s largest social network for the wider working world, we are seeing the rise of alternatives that are besting and beating it in specific verticals.
Amendments aim to protect autonomy and the independence of research funders from political interference.
A tool developed by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Basel to track Zika, Ebola and other viral disease outbreaks in real time.
A free, open-access journal designed to publish brief papers about research software.
Researchers must seek out others’ deposited biological sequences in community databases, urges Franziska Denk.
Goldman Sachs, the Wellcome Trust, and Bill Gates all put money into the Berlin company, which has over 12 million scientists on its platform.
The European Commission has changed the Horizon 2020 model grant agreement, to try to address complaints about low salary levels among the newer 13 member states.
WHO today published its first ever list of antibiotic-resistant "priority pathogens"—a catalogue of 12 families of bacteria that pose the greatest threat to human health.
It is often assumed that issue advocacy will compromise the credibility of scientists.
Q&A with Daniel Sarewitz, Professor of Science and Society at Arizona State University.
The problem of fake data may go far deeper than scientists admit. Now a team of researchers has a controversial plan to root out the perpetrators
Preprints are clearly the future of scientific communication, but currently face multiple obstacles.
Software called DeepCoder has solved simple programming challenges by piecing together bits of borrowed code.
Mathematical model works by trying to remove skewing of results in group funding decisions
New discoveries about the human mind show the limitations of reason.