The Royal Society's statement on research integrity sets out key principles and behaviours of an ethical nature for the Fellowship and all those that receive grants from the Society.

This study investigated the status quo of article retractions by Chinese researchers.

An analysis of potential predatory journals as well as potential poor scientific standards journals.

More than 26 percent of papers identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses contained spin. This figure rose to up to 84 percent in papers reporting on nonrandomised trials.

Do lay people and scientists themselves recognize that scientists are human and therefore prone to human fallibilities such as error, bias, and even dishonesty?

Study finds faulty research creates a significant drop in use of prior published work.

The landscape of the cash-per-publication reward policy in China and reveal its trend since the late 1990s.

A simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.

Science is said to be suffering a reproducibility crisis caused by many biases. How common are these problems, across the wide diversity of research fields? We probed for multiple bias-related patterns in a large random sample of meta-analyses taken from all disciplines.

Research institutions should have regular open conversations on authorship criteria and ethics and that funding agencies adopt ORCID and accept CRediT.

A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications.