Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Journals' Instructions to Authors: A Cross-sectional Study Across Scientific Disciplines

Journals' Instructions to Authors: A Cross-sectional Study Across Scientific Disciplines

Study investigated 19 topics related to transparency in reporting and research integrity. Only three topics were addressed in more than one third of scientific journals' Instructions to Authors.

Journals Retract More Than a Dozen Studies from China That May Have Used Executed Prisoners' Organs

Journals Retract More Than a Dozen Studies from China That May Have Used Executed Prisoners' Organs

In the past month, PLOS ONE and Transplantation have retracted fifteen studies by authors in China because of suspicions that the authors may have used organs from executed prisoners.

Nutrition Science Is Broken. This New Egg Study Shows Why.

Nutrition Science Is Broken. This New Egg Study Shows Why.

At turns lauded and vilified, the humble egg is an example of everything wrong with nutrition studies.

Journals' Plagiarism Detectors May Flag Papers in Error

Journals' Plagiarism Detectors May Flag Papers in Error

One recent case, in which a scientist claims his submitted manuscript was rejected despite a lack of actual plagiarism, highlights the limitations of automated tools.

Hyped-up Science is a Problem. One Clever Twitter Account is Pushing Back.

Hyped-up Science is a Problem. One Clever Twitter Account is Pushing Back.

How a simple nudge can improve health and nutrition reporting. The Twitter account retweets science articles, adding “IN MICE.”

Plagiarism Detectors Are a Crutch, and a Problem

Plagiarism Detectors Are a Crutch, and a Problem

Academics and editors need to stop pretending that software always catches recycled text and start reading more carefully, says Debora Weber-Wulff.

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Addressing Integrity Challenges in Research: the Institutional Dimension

Concern for and interest in research integrity has increased significantly during recent decades, both in academic and in policy discourse.

Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18

Plan to Replicate 50 High-Impact Cancer Papers Shrinks to Just 18

An ambitious project that set out nearly 5 years ago to replicate experiments from 50 high-impact cancer biology papers, but gradually shrank that number, now expects to complete just 18 studies.

The 'Loss of Confidence Project' Offers Scientists a Place to Confess

The 'Loss of Confidence Project' Offers Scientists a Place to Confess

What are researchers to do when they lose confidence in their previously published work? A new project has an answer. Will it help the replication crisis?

Open Science and Its Role in Universities: A Roadmap for Cultural Change

Open Science and Its Role in Universities: A Roadmap for Cultural Change

LERU's paper discussing the eight pillars of Open Science identified by the European Commission: the future of scholarly publishing, FAIR data, the European Open Science Cloud, education and skills, rewards and incentives, next-generation metrics, research integrity, and citizen science.

PSI: Investigation into Violation of Research Integrity Is Concluded

PSI: Investigation into Violation of Research Integrity Is Concluded

In June 2017, PSI was made aware of allegations that members of its staff had submitted an article containing aspects of scientific misconduct to a scientific journal.  A preliminary review by experts showed that the allegations raised were solid.

Repeat Offenders: When Scientific Fraudsters Slip Through the Cracks

Repeat Offenders: When Scientific Fraudsters Slip Through the Cracks

Balancing due process with the academic community's right to know is no easy task, but critics say more could be done to weed out bad actors.  Many universities halt investigations after an accused scientist departs, leaving future employers blind to the researcher’s history of allegations.

20th Anniversary of the Andrew Wakefield Vaccine Fraud - No Celebrations

20th Anniversary of the Andrew Wakefield Vaccine Fraud - No Celebrations

A bit over 20 years ago, in February 1998, Andrew Wakefield published his infamous article in Lancet, which was eventually retracted in 2010. He stated that "onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination in eight of the 12 children."