publications

Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Innovation Challenge report: a new approach to research funding

The Innovation Challenge report: a new approach to research funding

In a new report says that the government must increase taxpayer investment in research and development to match that of the UK’s competitors.

Ten simple rules for better figures

Ten simple rules for better figures

Scientific visualization is classically defined as the process of graphically displaying scientific data. However, this process is far from direct or automatic.

Science communication as political communication

Science communication as political communication

Scientific debates often blur the lines between the science that is being debated and the political, moral, and legal implications that come with its societal applications. This manuscript traces the origins of this phenomenon to professional norms within the scientific discipline.

Scientific Foresight blog

Scientific Foresight blog

The Scientific Foresight (STOA) Unit analyses the implications and options for future policy-making in science and technology related fields for the European Parliament.

Policy design and implementation monitoring

Policy design and implementation monitoring

We know that those Open Access policies that work are the ones that have teeth. Both institutional and funder policies work better when tied to reporting requirements.

Why null results rarely see the light of day

Why null results rarely see the light of day

Researchers have put numbers on the “file drawer” phenomenon, in which scientists abandon results that they believe journals are unlikely to publish.

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications

Papers retracted due to misconduct accounted for approximately $58 million in direct funding by the NIH between 1992 and 2012, less than 1% of the NIH budget over this period.

The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists

The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists

While social media is a valuable tool for outreach and the sharing of ideas, there is a danger that this form of communication is gaining too high a value and that we are losing sight of key metrics of scientific value, such as citation indices.

Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measuring efficacy of scholarly communications: current perspectives

Genesis of altmetrics or article-level metrics for measuring efficacy of scholarly communications: current perspectives

This paper provides a glimpse of genesis of altmetrics in measuring efficacy of scholarly communications. This paper also highlights available altmetric tools and social platforms linking altmetric tools, which are widely used in deriving altmetric scores of scholarly publications.

A surge of p-values between 0.040 and 0.049 in recent decades

A surge of p-values between 0.040 and 0.049 in recent decades

It is known that statistically significant results are more likely to be published than results that are not statistically significant. We conducted a search in the abstracts of papers published between 1990 and 2014. The results indicate that negative results are not disappearing, but have actually become 4.3 times more prevalent since 1990. Positive results, on the other hand, have become 13.9 times more prevalent since 1990.

Work Programme 2015

Work Programme 2015

This document is the annual work programme for the European Research Council funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.

Assessing Science

Assessing Science

Earlier this year, at a symposium organized by Nature in Melbourne, Australia, a group of leading academics, funders and government advisers discussed how research outcomes are measured. This Nature Outlook was influenced by these debates.

Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign

Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign

Retractions of scientific papers have recently been in the spotlight. Unfortunately, the interpretation of statistics about them is often flawed. Evidence suggests that retractions have grown not because of rising misconduct, but because scientists have become more aware of and responsive against fraudulent and flawed research.

Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): trainees report harassment and assault

Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): trainees report harassment and assault

Young researchers, especially women, are more likely to be sexually harassed or assaulted when they are doing fieldwork than in the office.

How the transition to Open Access could be accelerated by libraries working together

How the transition to Open Access could be accelerated by libraries working together

Libraries are in a good position to push Open Access even further, as they currently fully pay the production costs of the traditional subscription model.